Dineshkumar vs Ganesh Advocate - Beena.K — 100033/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Listed to. Next hearing: 09th July 2026.

Listed to Next hearing 09-Jul-2026 this date has passed

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLKM280000352023

Filing Number

35/2023

Filing Date

20-Jan-2023

Registration No

100033/2023

Registration Date

21-Jan-2023

Court

Munsiff Court ,Karunagappally

Judge

1-Munsiff

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 26

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Dineshkumar

    Adv. PRATHAP G.PADIKKAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ganesh Advocate - Beena.K

Case History

  1. 09-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Listed to

    Munsiff

  3. 25-Feb-2026

    No Further Time

    Munsiff

  4. 12-Feb-2026

    Pre trial steps

    Munsiff

  5. 23-Jan-2026

    Pre trial steps

    Munsiff

  6. 20-Nov-2025

    Issues

    Munsiff

  7. 06-Oct-2025

    Issues

    Munsiff

  8. 31-Jul-2025

    Issues

    Munsiff

  9. 05-Jul-2025

    Appearance Of Parties

    Munsiff

  10. 11-Apr-2025

    Order

  11. 11-Apr-2025

    Order

    SUMMARY: The Munsiff Court in Karunagappally allowed the claim petition filed by Soumya Mole and Surajith under Order 38 Rule 8 CPC to lift the attachment on their property. The court found that the petitioners purchased 2.83 acres of land from defendant Ganesh on 24.11.2022 (before the alleged transaction between plaintiff Dineshkumar and Ganesh on 28.11.2022) via valid sale deed, and the property was already mutated in their names with taxes paid. Since the petitioners had no role in the dispute and purchased the property before the underlying transaction, the attachment was lifted and orders communicated to the Sub Registrar and village office. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  12. 11-Apr-2025

    For hearing on IA

    Munsiff

  13. 07-Apr-2025

    Order/ Judgement

    Munsiff

  14. 03-Apr-2025

    Return of notice

    Munsiff

  15. 26-Mar-2025

    Call on

    Munsiff

  16. 21-Mar-2025

    Adjourned

    Munsiff

  17. 13-Mar-2025

    Verify and report

    Munsiff

  18. 07-Mar-2025

    For Hearing

    Munsiff

  19. 27-Feb-2025

    Objection

    Munsiff

  20. 24-Feb-2025

    Objection

    Munsiff

  21. 06-Feb-2025

    Objection

    Munsiff

  22. 09-Dec-2024

    Objection

    Munsiff

  23. 11-Nov-2024

    No sitting notified

    Munsiff

  24. 21-Aug-2024

    Call on

    Munsiff

  25. 25-Jul-2024

    Further evidence

    Munsiff

  26. 13-Mar-2024

    exparte evidence

    Munsiff

  27. 27-Nov-2023

    Written Statement

    Munsiff

  28. 10-Jul-2023

    Written Statement

    Munsiff

  29. 16-Mar-2023

    No sitting notified

    Munsiff

  30. 21-Jan-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  31. 20-Jan-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 100033/2023

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: The Munsiff Court in Karunagappally allowed the claim petition filed by Soumya Mole and Surajith under Order 38 Rule 8 CPC to lift the attachment on their property. The court found that the petitioners purchased 2.83 acres of land from defendant Ganesh on 24.11.2022 (before the alleged transaction between plaintiff Dineshkumar and Ganesh on 28.11.2022) via valid sale deed, and the property was already mutated in their names with taxes paid. Since the petitioners had no role in the dispute and purchased the property before the underlying transaction, the attachment was lifted and orders communicated to the Sub Registrar and village office. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case