State of Kerala Excise vs BABU RAJAN @ RAJU Advocate - Sachin Sunny — 1298/2017
Case under Abkari Act Section 55(i). Disposed: Contested--AQUITTED on 08th April 2026.
SC - SESSIONS CASE
CNR: KLKM270006862017
Filing Number
1298/2017
Filing Date
23-Aug-2017
Registration No
1298/2017
Registration Date
23-Aug-2017
Court
Sub Court Karunagappally
Judge
1-Sub Judge
Decision Date
08-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--AQUITTED
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Kerala Excise
Adv. HARILALJI.C
Respondent(s)
-
1.BABU RAJAN @ RAJU Advocate - Sachin Sunny
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-Apr-2026
JudgementView PDF
The court acquitted accused Prinjith of illegal liquor sales charges under the Abkari Act due to serious procedural failures in the prosecution's case. Critical defects included: failure to establish chain of custody (thondy clerk and sample forwarding officials not examined), blank spaces in the forwarding note identifying who transmitted samples to the lab, non-production of seized contraband or chemical examination certificates, and inadequate certified inventory documentation. The court found these breaches violated the Kerala High Court's streamlined procedures from *Vijayan v. State of Kerala*, making the evidence unreliable and entitling the accused to acquittal under reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Apr-2026
Disposed
Sub Judge
-
04-Apr-2026
For judgment
Sub Judge
-
28-Mar-2026
Call on
Sub Judge
-
26-Mar-2026
Defence Evidence
Sub Judge
-
25-Mar-2026
For 313
Sub Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
Issue Summons
Sub Judge
-
05-Mar-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Sub Judge
-
17-Feb-2026
No sitting notified
Sub Judge
-
28-Jan-2026
Produce witnesses
Sub Judge
-
08-Jan-2026
Issue Summons
Sub Judge
-
24-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Aug-2017
Case filed
Registration No. 1298/2017
The court acquitted accused Prinjith of illegal liquor sales charges under the Abkari Act due to serious procedural failures in the prosecution's case. Critical defects included: failure to establish chain of custody (thondy clerk and sample forwarding officials not examined), blank spaces in the forwarding note identifying who transmitted samples to the lab, non-production of seized contraband or chemical examination certificates, and inadequate certified inventory documentation. The court found these breaches violated the Kerala High Court's streamlined procedures from *Vijayan v. State of Kerala*, making the evidence unreliable and entitling the accused to acquittal under reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts