State of Kerala Police vs Santhosh — 100717/2019

Case under Abkari Act Section 55(i). Disposed: Contested--AQUITTED on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

SC - SESSIONS CASE

CNR: KLKM270002712019

Filing Number

100152/2019

Filing Date

19-Jun-2019

Registration No

100717/2019

Registration Date

19-Jun-2019

Court

Sub Court Karunagappally

Judge

1-Sub Judge

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--AQUITTED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

818

Police Station

Chavara PS

Year

18

Acts & Sections

Abkari Act Section 55(i)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Kerala Police

    Adv. Baiju N.S.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Santhosh

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary: State of Kerala Police v. Santhosh (S.C No. 717/2019) The court acquitted Santhosh of charges under Section 55(a) of the Abkari Act (illicit liquor sales) due to critical prosecutorial failures. Police had allegedly seized 30 IMFL bottles from the accused in July 2018, but the prosecution failed to produce either the seized contraband or certified inventory/photographs as required by law, and key investigating officers did not testify despite repeated opportunities. The two independent witnesses examined by the prosecution denied witnessing the alleged detection and seizure, rendering their evidence unhelpful. The court found the prosecution had not followed proper procedural safeguards established in *Vijayan v. State of Kerala* and applied the acquittal provision under Section 232 CrPC, finding insufficient cogent evidence to establish guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Sub Judge

  4. 28-Mar-2026

    Call on

    Sub Judge

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    For Hearing

    Sub Judge

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    No sitting notified

    Sub Judge

  7. 25-Feb-2026

    for evidence.

    Sub Judge

  8. 17-Jan-2026

    Call on

    Sub Judge

  9. 12-Dec-2025

    Call on

    Sub Judge

  10. 17-Nov-2025

    Produce witnesses

    Sub Judge

  11. 16-Oct-2025

    Call on

    Sub Judge

  12. 08-Sep-2025

    Issue Bailable Warrant

    Sub Judge

  13. 29-Jul-2025

    Call on

    Sub Judge

  14. 27-May-2025

    Call on

    Sub Judge

  15. 20-Mar-2025

    Call on

    Sub Judge

  16. 07-Mar-2025

    Call on

    Sub Judge

  17. 11-Feb-2025

    Call on

    Sub Judge

  18. 16-Jan-2025

    Call on

    Sub Judge

  19. 20-Dec-2024

    No sitting notified

    Sub Judge

  20. 24-Oct-2024

    Call on

    Sub Judge

  21. 29-Aug-2024

    Call on

    Sub Judge

  22. 28-May-2024

    Call on

    Sub Judge

  23. 16-Dec-2023

    Call on

    Sub Judge

  24. 14-Sep-2023

    Call on

    Sub Judge

  25. 29-May-2023

    Call on

    Sub Judge

  26. 14-Mar-2023

    Call on

    Sub Judge

  27. 13-Mar-2023

    No sitting notified

    Sub Judge

  28. 10-Jan-2023

    Call on

    Sub Judge

  29. 15-Dec-2022

    Call on

    Sub Judge

  30. 18-Oct-2022

    for evidence.

    Sub Judge

  31. 14-Jul-2022

    Hearing on Charge

    Sub Judge

  32. 04-Mar-2022

    Advanced

    Sub Judge

  33. 15-Dec-2021

    No Further Time

    Sub Judge

  34. 14-Sep-2021

    Adjourned

    Sub Judge

  35. 02-Jun-2021

    No sitting notified

    Sub Judge

  36. 20-Nov-2020

    Adjourned

    Sub Judge

  37. 05-Aug-2020

    Adjourned

    Sub Judge

  38. 30-Jun-2020

    Adjourned

    Sub Judge

  39. 10-Feb-2020

    Call on

    Sub Judge

  40. 13-Dec-2019

    No sitting notified

    Sub Judge

  41. 11-Oct-2019

    Call on

    Sub Judge

  42. 24-Aug-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  43. 19-Jun-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. 100717/2019

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Kerala Police v. Santhosh (S.C No. 717/2019) The court acquitted Santhosh of charges under Section 55(a) of the Abkari Act (illicit liquor sales) due to critical prosecutorial failures. Police had allegedly seized 30 IMFL bottles from the accused in July 2018, but the prosecution failed to produce either the seized contraband or certified inventory/photographs as required by law, and key investigating officers did not testify despite repeated opportunities. The two independent witnesses examined by the prosecution denied witnessing the alleged detection and seizure, rendering their evidence unhelpful. The court found the prosecution had not followed proper procedural safeguards established in *Vijayan v. State of Kerala* and applied the acquittal provision under Section 232 CrPC, finding insufficient cogent evidence to establish guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case