Anandan vs Soorandu North Karottu Kudumnakeshethram, Edappanayam, Soorandu North — 100017/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26(1). Status: Written Statement. Next hearing: 01st July 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLKM270000922025
Next Hearing
01st July 2026
e-Filing Number
07-02-2025
Filing Number
1302/2025
Filing Date
15-02-2025
Registration No
100017/2025
Registration Date
15-02-2025
Court
Sub Court Karunagappally
Judge
1-Sub Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Anandan
Adv. Ranjith A.
Binu
Adv. Ranjith A.,RANJITH A RANJITH A
Respondent(s)
Soorandu North Karottu Kudumnakeshethram, Edappanayam, Soorandu North
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Sub Judge
Written Statement
For Order
For Order
For Order
For Order
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Written Statement |
| 27-03-2026 | For Order |
| 21-03-2026 | For Order |
| 13-03-2026 | For Order |
| 28-02-2026 | For Order |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 100017/2025 The court appointed Smt. Lekha Vamadevan, Official Receiver of Kollam, as Receiver for managing the Karottu Family Temple pending final disposal of the scheme suit. The court found that petitioners established a strong prima facie case showing defendants 2 and 3 failed to maintain proper accounts of temple income/expenses, and directed them to hand over temple keys and records to the Receiver on demand. The Receiver must submit quarterly accounts to the court, with each party bearing their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 100017/2025 The court appointed Smt. Lekha Vamadevan, Official Receiver of Kollam, as Receiver for managing the Karottu Family Temple pending final disposal of the scheme suit. The court found that petitioners established a strong prima facie case showing defendants 2 and 3 failed to maintain proper accounts of temple income/expenses, and directed them to hand over temple keys and records to the Receiver on demand. The Receiver must submit quarterly accounts to the court, with each party bearing their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts