Kerala State vs Vishnu Advocate - Binu C — 1000668/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 143,147,148,341,294 b,323,324,427. Disposed: Uncontested--AQUITTED U/S 248(1) CR.PC on 30th March 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLKM250019552022
Filing Number
701/2022
Filing Date
24-Nov-2022
Registration No
1000668/2022
Registration Date
24-Nov-2022
Court
Judl.First Class Magistrate Court, Sasthamcotta
Judge
1-Judl. I Class Magistrate, Sasthamcotta
Decision Date
30-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--AQUITTED U/S 248(1) CR.PC
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
1592
Police Station
East Kallada PS
Year
2017
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Kerala State
Respondent(s)
-
1.Vishnu Advocate - Binu C
-
2.Rahul
Adv. Akhil R
-
3.Mithun
-
4.Renjith
Adv. Akhil R
-
5.Sajin
Adv. Binu C
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Mar-2026
JudgementView PDF
Case Summary: Calendar Case No. 668/2022 Court Decision: The Judicial First Class Magistrate acquitted five accused persons (A1, A2, A4-A6) of charges including unlawful assembly, rioting, wrongful restraint, obscene language, voluntarily causing hurt/grievous hurt, and criminal mischief under IPC sections 143, 147, 148, 341, 294(b), 323, 324, and 427 r/w 149. The charge against A3 was abated due to his death. Key Reasoning: The prosecution case collapsed when the complainant (PW1) turned hostile, denying he sustained injuries and stating he did not know the assailants. The prosecution subsequently abandoned examination of all other witnesses. Finding no cogent or reliable evidence, the court held the prosecution miserably failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judl. I Class Magistrate, Sasthamcotta
-
28-Mar-2026
Call on
Judl. I Class Magistrate, Sasthamcotta
-
26-Mar-2026
Order/Judgement
Judl. I Class Magistrate, Sasthamcotta
-
13-Mar-2026
Call on
Judl. I Class Magistrate, Sasthamcotta
-
12-Feb-2026
Repeat Summons
Judl. I Class Magistrate, Sasthamcotta
-
07-Feb-2026
Issue Summons
Judl. I Class Magistrate, Sasthamcotta
-
29-Jan-2026
Repeat Summons
Judl. I Class Magistrate, Sasthamcotta
-
01-Jan-2026
Issue Bailable Warrant
Judl. I Class Magistrate, Sasthamcotta
-
28-Nov-2025
For Examination of Witness
Judl. I Class Magistrate, Sasthamcotta
-
21-Nov-2025
For Examination of Witness
Judl. I Class Magistrate, Sasthamcotta
-
30-Oct-2025
Issue Summons
Judl. I Class Magistrate, Sasthamcotta
-
04-Oct-2025
Appearance of Accused
Judl. I Class Magistrate, Sasthamcotta
-
02-Sep-2025
Appearance of Accused
Judl. I Class Magistrate, Sasthamcotta
-
19-Jul-2025
For appearance of the accused
Judl. I Class Magistrate, Sasthamcotta
-
26-Jun-2025
Issue NBW
Judl. I Class Magistrate, Sasthamcotta
-
03-May-2025
For framing charge
Judl. I Class Magistrate, Sasthamcotta
-
28-Mar-2025
For framing charge
Judl. I Class Magistrate, Sasthamcotta
-
07-Mar-2025
Call on
Judl. I Class Magistrate, Sasthamcotta
-
28-Feb-2025
Issue NBW
Judl. I Class Magistrate, Sasthamcotta
-
17-Jan-2025
Call on
Judl. I Class Magistrate, Sasthamcotta
-
05-Dec-2024
Call on
Judl. I Class Magistrate, Sasthamcotta
-
03-Oct-2024
Call on
Judl. I Class Magistrate, Sasthamcotta
-
29-Aug-2024
Call on
Judl. I Class Magistrate, Sasthamcotta
-
24-May-2024
Call on
Judl. I Class Magistrate, Sasthamcotta
-
01-Feb-2024
Call on
Judl. I Class Magistrate, Sasthamcotta
-
28-Dec-2023
Call on
Judl. I Class Magistrate, Sasthamcotta
-
29-Sep-2023
Call on
Judl. I Class Magistrate, Sasthamcotta
-
16-Jun-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Nov-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 1000668/2022
Case Summary: Calendar Case No. 668/2022 Court Decision: The Judicial First Class Magistrate acquitted five accused persons (A1, A2, A4-A6) of charges including unlawful assembly, rioting, wrongful restraint, obscene language, voluntarily causing hurt/grievous hurt, and criminal mischief under IPC sections 143, 147, 148, 341, 294(b), 323, 324, and 427 r/w 149. The charge against A3 was abated due to his death. Key Reasoning: The prosecution case collapsed when the complainant (PW1) turned hostile, denying he sustained injuries and stating he did not know the assailants. The prosecution subsequently abandoned examination of all other witnesses. Finding no cogent or reliable evidence, the court held the prosecution miserably failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts