Kerala State vs Vishnu Advocate - Binu C — 1000668/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 143,147,148,341,294 b,323,324,427. Disposed: Uncontested--AQUITTED U/S 248(1) CR.PC on 30th March 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLKM250019552022
Filing Number
701/2022
Filing Date
24-11-2022
Registration No
1000668/2022
Registration Date
24-11-2022
Court
Judl.First Class Magistrate Court, Sasthamcotta
Judge
1-Judl. I Class Magistrate, Sasthamcotta
Decision Date
30th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--AQUITTED U/S 248(1) CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
1592
Police Station
East Kallada PS
Year
2017
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kerala State
Respondent(s)
Vishnu Advocate - Binu C
Rahul
Adv. Akhil R
Mithun
Renjith
Adv. Akhil R
Sajin
Adv. Binu C
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judl. I Class Magistrate, Sasthamcotta
Disposed
Call on
Order/Judgement
Call on
Repeat Summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 28-03-2026 | Call on |
| 26-03-2026 | Order/Judgement |
| 13-03-2026 | Call on |
| 12-02-2026 | Repeat Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Calendar Case No. 668/2022 Court Decision: The Judicial First Class Magistrate acquitted five accused persons (A1, A2, A4-A6) of charges including unlawful assembly, rioting, wrongful restraint, obscene language, voluntarily causing hurt/grievous hurt, and criminal mischief under IPC sections 143, 147, 148, 341, 294(b), 323, 324, and 427 r/w 149. The charge against A3 was abated due to his death. Key Reasoning: The prosecution case collapsed when the complainant (PW1) turned hostile, denying he sustained injuries and stating he did not know the assailants. The prosecution subsequently abandoned examination of all other witnesses. Finding no cogent or reliable evidence, the court held the prosecution miserably failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Calendar Case No. 668/2022 Court Decision: The Judicial First Class Magistrate acquitted five accused persons (A1, A2, A4-A6) of charges including unlawful assembly, rioting, wrongful restraint, obscene language, voluntarily causing hurt/grievous hurt, and criminal mischief under IPC sections 143, 147, 148, 341, 294(b), 323, 324, and 427 r/w 149. The charge against A3 was abated due to his death. Key Reasoning: The prosecution case collapsed when the complainant (PW1) turned hostile, denying he sustained injuries and stating he did not know the assailants. The prosecution subsequently abandoned examination of all other witnesses. Finding no cogent or reliable evidence, the court held the prosecution miserably failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts