Rasiya vs Nissam Advocate - K. SAIFUDEEN — 20/2017

Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 12. Status: Await report. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

MC - MISCELLANEOUS CASE

CNR: KLKM250005442017

Await report

Next Hearing

11th June 2026

Filing Number

540/2017

Filing Date

17-07-2017

Registration No

20/2017

Registration Date

17-07-2017

Court

Judl.First Class Magistrate Court, Sasthamcotta

Judge

1-Judl. I Class Magistrate, Sasthamcotta

Acts & Sections

Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 12
Crl.MP/1276/2025 Classification : Petition Section RasiyaNissam

Petitioner(s)

Rasiya

Adv. S Jalaludheen

Muhammed Mussamin

Respondent(s)

Nissam Advocate - K. SAIFUDEEN

Suhara Beevi

Nafisath

Naseema

Jamaludeen

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Judl. I Class Magistrate, Sasthamcotta

30-05-2026

Await report

08-05-2026

Appearance Of Parties

25-04-2026

For cross examination.

28-03-2026

Appearance of Petitioner

13-03-2026

Appearance of Petitioner

Interim Orders

03-11-2017
Judgement

Case Summary: Rasiya and Muhammed Mussamin v. Nisam Advocate - K. Saifudeen and Others (20/2017) Outcome: The court dismissed the respondents' maintainability challenge (CMP 1096/17) and ruled that the domestic violence petition under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 is maintainable in this court. The petitioner's residence in Edavanasseri Muri, Mynagapally Village was established through documentary evidence (Aadhar card, election ID, school certificate), proving jurisdiction despite respondents' claims she resided elsewhere. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Rasiya and Muhammed Mussamin v. Nisam Advocate - K. Saifudeen and Others (20/2017) Outcome: The court dismissed the respondents' maintainability challenge (CMP 1096/17) and ruled that the domestic violence petition under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 is maintainable in this court. The petitioner's residence in Edavanasseri Muri, Mynagapally Village was established through documentary evidence (Aadhar card, election ID, school certificate), proving jurisdiction despite respondents' claims she resided elsewhere. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Judl.First Class Magistrate Court, Sasthamcotta All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case