State of Kerala Police vs Sangeeth Advocate - SHEFINA, Pushpanandan S., Pushpanandan S.SHEFINA, — 100853/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420,465,467,468,469,471,474,419,506(1),34. Disposed: Uncontested--TRANSFERRED on 06th May 2026.

CC - CALENDAR CASE

CNR: KLKM220040102022

Case disposed

Filing Number

1001249/2022

Filing Date

26-10-2022

Registration No

100853/2022

Registration Date

26-10-2022

Court

Judl.I Class Magistrate Court-I, Kottarakkara

Judge

1-Judl.I Class Magistrate-I, Kottarakkara

Decision Date

06th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--TRANSFERRED

FIR Details

FIR Number

3696

Police Station

Kottarakkara PS

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

IPC Section 420,465,467,468,469,471,474,419,506(1),34
Crl.MP/1/2026 Classification : Petition Section SangeethState of Kerala Police
Crl.MP/2/2026 Classification : Bail Application Section State of Kerala Police

Petitioner(s)

State of Kerala Police

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Sangeeth Advocate - SHEFINA, Pushpanandan S., Pushpanandan S.SHEFINA,

Ajith B.G

Adv. Alwin Roys Abraham

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Judl.I Class Magistrate-I, Kottarakkara

06-05-2026

Disposed

28-04-2026

Call on

22-04-2026

Call on

21-04-2026

For Examination of Witness

20-04-2026

Call on

Interim Orders

16-03-2026
Order

Case Summary: 100853/2022 The court granted Sangeeth (first accused) exemption from personal appearance for three years under Section 228 of BNSS 2023, allowing his counsel to represent him during trial proceedings. The exemption was conditional upon the accused not disputing his identity, his counsel appearing at every hearing, and his presence at examination under Section 351 of BNSS, with automatic cancellation if conditions are violated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 100853/2022 The court granted Sangeeth (first accused) exemption from personal appearance for three years under Section 228 of BNSS 2023, allowing his counsel to represent him during trial proceedings. The exemption was conditional upon the accused not disputing his identity, his counsel appearing at every hearing, and his presence at examination under Section 351 of BNSS, with automatic cancellation if conditions are violated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Judl.I Class Magistrate Court-I, Kottarakkara All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case