State of Kerala Police vs Biju Advocate - Soman Pillai K. — 101866/2020
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),452,427,506(ii),34. Disposed: Uncontested--ACQUITTED U/S 271 BNSS on 20th May 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLKM220034922020
Filing Number
101866/2020
Filing Date
29-09-2020
Registration No
101866/2020
Registration Date
29-09-2020
Court
Judl.I Class Magistrate Court-I, Kottarakkara
Judge
1-Judl.I Class Magistrate-I, Kottarakkara
Decision Date
20th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ACQUITTED U/S 271 BNSS
FIR Details
FIR Number
431
Police Station
Kottarakkara PS
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala Police
Adv. Shyla Mathai
Respondent(s)
Biju Advocate - Soman Pillai K.
Deepu
Adv. Soman Pillai K.
Ganesh Kumar
Adv. Soman Pillai K.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judl.I Class Magistrate-I, Kottarakkara
Disposed
Order/Judgement
FOR HEARING
FOR HEARING
Repeat Summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 19-05-2026 | Order/Judgement |
| 08-05-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 27-04-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 13-03-2026 | Repeat Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Calendar Case 1866/2020 The Kottarakkara First Class Magistrate Court acquitted three accused (Biju, Deepu, and Ganesh Kumar) of charges under IPC sections 452, 294(b), 427, and 506(ii) r/w 34 for an alleged February 2020 incident involving criminal trespass, obscene language, property damage, and criminal intimidation. The prosecution's case collapsed after both eyewitness PW1 and injured witness PW2 turned hostile and failed to support the allegations; the court found insufficient evidence to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Calendar Case 1866/2020 The Kottarakkara First Class Magistrate Court acquitted three accused (Biju, Deepu, and Ganesh Kumar) of charges under IPC sections 452, 294(b), 427, and 506(ii) r/w 34 for an alleged February 2020 incident involving criminal trespass, obscene language, property damage, and criminal intimidation. The prosecution's case collapsed after both eyewitness PW1 and injured witness PW2 turned hostile and failed to support the allegations; the court found insufficient evidence to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts