State of Kerala Police vs Sijatha Advocate - Raveendran P.K. — 100529/2019

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,294(b),323,34. Status: FOR HEARING. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.

CC - CALENDAR CASE

CNR: KLKM220027402019

FOR HEARING

Next Hearing

29th June 2026

Filing Number

100529/2019

Filing Date

13-06-2019

Registration No

100529/2019

Registration Date

13-06-2019

Court

Judl.I Class Magistrate Court-I, Kottarakkara

Judge

1-Judl.I Class Magistrate-I, Kottarakkara

FIR Details

FIR Number

807

Police Station

Ezhukone PS

Year

2019

Acts & Sections

IPC Section 341,294(b),323,34
Crl.MP/1/2026 Classification : Advance Application Section State of Kerala PoliceSijatha
Crl.MP/2/2026 Classification : Petition Section State of Kerala PoliceSijatha
Crl.MP/3/2026 Classification : Petition Section State of Kerala Police

Petitioner(s)

State of Kerala Police

Adv. Shyla Mathai

Respondent(s)

Sijatha Advocate - Raveendran P.K.

Sudhi

Adv. Raveendran P.K.

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Judl.I Class Magistrate-I, Kottarakkara

04-06-2026

FOR HEARING

14-05-2026

Call on

13-05-2026

Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC

08-05-2026

Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC

06-05-2026

Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC

Interim Orders

14-05-2026
Order

Case Summary: 100529/2019 Outcome: Petition ALLOWED. The court granted permission to the accused (Sujatha Ammal) to renew her passport for three years. The court found that pending criminal proceedings (under IPC sections 341, 294(b), and 323) are not a bar to passport renewal when the accused is already on bail and has legitimate reasons to travel abroad to live with her son. The prosecution raised no objection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 100529/2019 Outcome: Petition ALLOWED. The court granted permission to the accused (Sujatha Ammal) to renew her passport for three years. The court found that pending criminal proceedings (under IPC sections 341, 294(b), and 323) are not a bar to passport renewal when the accused is already on bail and has legitimate reasons to travel abroad to live with her son. The prosecution raised no objection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Judl.I Class Magistrate Court-I, Kottarakkara All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case