State of Kerala Police vs VISHNU — 100274/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 309(4). Disposed: Uncontested--ACQUITTED U/S 271 BNSS on 07th April 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLKM220009092025
e-Filing Number
14-03-2025
Filing Number
100273/2025
Filing Date
14-03-2025
Registration No
100274/2025
Registration Date
14-03-2025
Court
Judl.I Class Magistrate Court-I, Kottarakkara
Judge
1-Judl.I Class Magistrate-I, Kottarakkara
Decision Date
07th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ACQUITTED U/S 271 BNSS
FIR Details
FIR Number
2540
Police Station
Kottarakkara PS
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala Police
Respondent(s)
VISHNU
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judl.I Class Magistrate-I, Kottarakkara
Disposed
FOR HEARING
Remand Extended
Remand Extended
Call on
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 04-04-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 01-04-2026 | Remand Extended |
| 30-03-2026 | Remand Extended |
| 27-03-2026 | Call on |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 274/2025 The Judicial Magistrate acquitted Vishnu of robbery charges under Section 309(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, finding the prosecution failed to establish essential ingredients of the offense. Key witnesses, including the complainant who lost his mobile phone, provided no incriminating evidence against the accused; the complainant admitted he had no complaint against anyone, the investigating officer found no evidence linking the phone to the complainant, and the alleged eyewitness declared himself hostile. The court found the charges unsustainable and granted clear acquittal with immediate release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 274/2025 The Judicial Magistrate acquitted Vishnu of robbery charges under Section 309(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, finding the prosecution failed to establish essential ingredients of the offense. Key witnesses, including the complainant who lost his mobile phone, provided no incriminating evidence against the accused; the complainant admitted he had no complaint against anyone, the investigating officer found no evidence linking the phone to the complainant, and the alleged eyewitness declared himself hostile. The court found the charges unsustainable and granted clear acquittal with immediate release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts