State of Kerala Police vs Suku — 100131/2020
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),341,323,506(i). Disposed: Uncontested--AQUITTED on 21st April 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLKM220005172020
Filing Number
100131/2020
Filing Date
11-02-2020
Registration No
100131/2020
Registration Date
11-02-2020
Court
Judl.I Class Magistrate Court-I, Kottarakkara
Judge
1-Judl.I Class Magistrate-I, Kottarakkara
Decision Date
21st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--AQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
3768
Police Station
Kottarakkara PS
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala Police
Adv. APP KTR
Respondent(s)
Suku
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judl.I Class Magistrate-I, Kottarakkara
Disposed
Order/ Judgement
FOR HEARING
FOR HEARING
FOR HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 20-04-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 08-04-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 31-03-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 13-03-2026 | FOR HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Kerala Police v. Suku (Case 100131/2020) The Kottarakkara First Class Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted Suku of charges under IPC sections 294(b) (obscene words), 341 (wrongful restraint), 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), and 506(i) (criminal intimidation) arising from a November 2019 incident. The prosecution's sole material witness (PW1/Nihas) admitted he identified the accused based on hearsay and testified in a manner that contradicted the prosecution case. The court found insufficient evidence to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt and held the prosecution failed to establish the accused's involvement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Kerala Police v. Suku (Case 100131/2020) The Kottarakkara First Class Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted Suku of charges under IPC sections 294(b) (obscene words), 341 (wrongful restraint), 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), and 506(i) (criminal intimidation) arising from a November 2019 incident. The prosecution's sole material witness (PW1/Nihas) admitted he identified the accused based on hearsay and testified in a manner that contradicted the prosecution case. The court found insufficient evidence to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt and held the prosecution failed to establish the accused's involvement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts