Baby vs Sivadasan — 100009/2022
Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section Order21,Rule10,11,12. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED on 13th March 2026.
EP - EXECUTION PETITION
CNR: KLKM210001942022
Filing Number
193/2022
Filing Date
11-03-2022
Registration No
100009/2022
Registration Date
11-03-2022
Court
Munsiff Court, Kottarakkara
Judge
1-Munsiff
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Baby
Adv. Unnikrishnan Nair K.
Subhakaran (died)
Adv. Unnikrishnan Nair K.
Suja
Adv. Unnikrishnan Nair K.
Suma
Adv. Unnikrishnan Nair K.
Respondent(s)
Sivadasan
Vasanthi
Sobhana
Sudeendran
Sasidharan
Prabha
Raveendran. K
Devadasan
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Munsiff
Disposed
FOR HEARING
FOR HEARING
Call on
Call with IA
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 21-02-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 17-02-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 27-01-2026 | Call on |
| 17-12-2025 | Call with IA |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court dismissed the execution petition filed by decree holders Baby, Shubakaran (deceased), and Suja seeking to enforce a decree for 3/5th share of a property. The court found no valid final decree existed to execute, as the decree holders filed a fresh application (IA 12/25) instead, rendering the execution petition redundant and accordingly closed it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court dismissed the execution petition filed by decree holders Baby, Shubakaran (deceased), and Suja seeking to enforce a decree for 3/5th share of a property. The court found no valid final decree existed to execute, as the decree holders filed a fresh application (IA 12/25) instead, rendering the execution petition redundant and accordingly closed it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts