Ansia vs Muhsina Advocate - Radhakrishnan Nair S. (Chithara) — 100101/2019
Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section 26,Order7,Rule1. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 13th March 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLKM210001522019
Filing Number
124/2019
Filing Date
13-02-2019
Registration No
100101/2019
Registration Date
13-02-2019
Court
Munsiff Court, Kottarakkara
Judge
1-Munsiff
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ansia
Adv. Bilahari G.R.
Respondent(s)
Muhsina Advocate - Radhakrishnan Nair S. (Chithara)
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Munsiff
Disposed
Listed to
Pre trial steps
No sitting notified
For reports
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-02-2026 | Listed to |
| 06-02-2026 | Pre trial steps |
| 19-01-2026 | No sitting notified |
| 18-12-2025 | For reports |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: OS No. 101/2019 (Munsiff Court, Kottarakara) The court dismissed Ansia's suit seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against Muhsina for default. The plaintiff failed to appear on the hearing date of March 13, 2026, despite being called, and provided no sufficient reason for her absence or inability to adduce evidence. The dismissal was ordered under CPC Order 9 Rule 12 read with Order 17 Rule 3(b). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: OS No. 101/2019 (Munsiff Court, Kottarakara) The court dismissed Ansia's suit seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against Muhsina for default. The plaintiff failed to appear on the hearing date of March 13, 2026, despite being called, and provided no sufficient reason for her absence or inability to adduce evidence. The dismissal was ordered under CPC Order 9 Rule 12 read with Order 17 Rule 3(b). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts