Ansia vs Muhsina Advocate - Radhakrishnan Nair S. (Chithara) — 100101/2019

Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section 26,Order7,Rule1. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLKM210001522019

Filing Number

124/2019

Filing Date

13-Feb-2019

Registration No

100101/2019

Registration Date

13-Feb-2019

Court

Munsiff Court, Kottarakkara

Judge

1-Munsiff

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section 26,Order7,Rule1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ansia

    Adv. Bilahari G.R.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Muhsina Advocate - Radhakrishnan Nair S. (Chithara)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary: OS No. 101/2019 (Munsiff Court, Kottarakara) The court dismissed Ansia's suit seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against Muhsina for default. The plaintiff failed to appear on the hearing date of March 13, 2026, despite being called, and provided no sufficient reason for her absence or inability to adduce evidence. The dismissal was ordered under CPC Order 9 Rule 12 read with Order 17 Rule 3(b). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Munsiff

  4. 10-Feb-2026

    Listed to

    Munsiff

  5. 06-Feb-2026

    Pre trial steps

    Munsiff

  6. 19-Jan-2026

    No sitting notified

    Munsiff

  7. 18-Dec-2025

    For reports

    Munsiff

  8. 29-Nov-2025

    Call for report.

    Munsiff

  9. 26-Nov-2025

    For reports

    Munsiff

  10. 15-Nov-2025

    For reports

    Munsiff

  11. 18-Oct-2025

    No sitting notified

    Munsiff

  12. 30-Sep-2025

    No sitting notified

    Munsiff

  13. 25-Sep-2025

    Report on mediation

    Munsiff

  14. 11-Sep-2025

    For reports

    Munsiff

  15. 26-Aug-2025

    Issues

    Munsiff

  16. 13-Aug-2025

    Report on mediation

    Munsiff

  17. 15-Jul-2025

    Issues

    Munsiff

  18. 24-Jun-2025

    Issues

    Munsiff

  19. 21-May-2025

    Issues

    Munsiff

  20. 02-Apr-2025

    Issues

    Munsiff

  21. 04-Mar-2025

    Issues

    Munsiff

  22. 10-Feb-2025

    Issues

    Munsiff

  23. 03-Jan-2025

    for evidence.

    Munsiff

  24. 06-Dec-2024

    for evidence.

    Munsiff

  25. 15-Oct-2024

    for evidence.

    Munsiff

  26. 01-Aug-2024

    Call with IA

    Munsiff

  27. 08-Apr-2024

    Call with IA

    Munsiff

  28. 01-Feb-2024

    Call with IA

    Munsiff

  29. 29-Nov-2023

    Call with IA

    Munsiff

  30. 26-Sep-2023

    Call with IA

    Munsiff

  31. 07-Aug-2023

    For Replication

    Munsiff

  32. 14-Feb-2023

    For Replication

    Munsiff

  33. 10-Nov-2022

    For Replication

    Munsiff

  34. 22-Aug-2022

    For Replication

    Munsiff

  35. 08-Jun-2022

    For Replication

    Munsiff

  36. 16-Mar-2022

    For Replication

    Munsiff

  37. 14-Feb-2022

    For Replication

    Munsiff

  38. 12-Nov-2021

    For Replication

    Munsiff

  39. 27-Oct-2021

    Issues

    Munsiff

  40. 31-Jul-2021

    Issues

    Munsiff

  41. 28-May-2021

    Issues

    Munsiff

  42. 10-Feb-2021

    Issues

    Munsiff

  43. 10-Jul-2020

    Issues

    Munsiff

  44. 10-Feb-2020

    Payment of balance court fee.

    Munsiff

  45. 01-Oct-2019

    Payment of balance court fee.

    Munsiff

  46. 10-Apr-2019

    Written Statement

    Munsiff

  47. 21-Feb-2019

    Issue summons to defendants. For return of Summons

    Munsiff

  48. 13-Feb-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  49. 13-Feb-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. 100101/2019

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: OS No. 101/2019 (Munsiff Court, Kottarakara) The court dismissed Ansia's suit seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against Muhsina for default. The plaintiff failed to appear on the hearing date of March 13, 2026, despite being called, and provided no sufficient reason for her absence or inability to adduce evidence. The dismissal was ordered under CPC Order 9 Rule 12 read with Order 17 Rule 3(b). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case