Badarudheen vs Noushad — 100107/2025

Case Summary: 100107/2025 Outcome: Petition dismissed. The Munsiff Court rejected Badarudheen's injunction petition against Ruksana and Sanooja regarding a pathway (D schedule property). The court found that Badarudheen failed to establish a prima facie case because: (1) he did not claim any personal right over the disputed pathway; (2) the owners of properties B and C—whom he claimed to represent as "agent by necessity"—were not made parties to the suit, making it unmaintainable; and (3) evidence showed the defendants purchased land to widen an existing way for their exclusive use, with clear boundary demarcation. The court concluded the defendants have exclusive user rights over the pathway. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.