Vijayamma vs Gopakumar. N Advocate - Harikumar C.K. — 100010/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O.41R.1. Status: No sitting notified. Next hearing: 30th June 2026.

AS - CIVIL APPEAL

CNR: KLKM200006492023

No sitting notified

Next Hearing

30th June 2026

Filing Number

100163/2023

Filing Date

22-12-2023

Registration No

100010/2023

Registration Date

22-12-2023

Court

Sub Court, Kottarakkara

Judge

1-Sub Judge,Kottarakara

Acts & Sections

Civil Procedure Code Section O.41R.1
IA/1/2021 Classification : Section VijayammaGopakumar. N
IA/2/2022 Classification : Section Gopakumar. NVijayamma
IA/3/2022 Classification : Section Gopakumar. NVijayamma
IA/4/2023 Classification : Section VijayammaGopakumar. N
IA/5/2023 Classification : Section VijayammaGopakumar. N
IA/6/2024 Classification : Section VijayammaGopakumar. N
IA/1/2026 Classification : Petition Section Gopakumar. NVijayamma

Petitioner(s)

Vijayamma

Adv. Raveendran P.K.

Respondent(s)

Gopakumar. N Advocate - Harikumar C.K.

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Sub Judge,Kottarakara

21-05-2026

No sitting notified

13-03-2026

Report from FSL

30-01-2026

Call with IA

13-01-2026

For Steps

07-01-2026

For Steps

Interim Orders

11-12-2025
Final Order

Case Summary: Vijayamma v. Gopakumar. N (IA 6/2024 in AS 10/2023) The court allowed Vijayamma's petition to send a disputed demand promissory note to the Forensic Science Laboratory (FSL) for signature and handwriting comparison. Vijayamma, the defendant in an underlying money recovery suit, had consistently denied executing the promissory note, and the court found she was entitled to forensic examination to disprove the plaintiff's claims. The petitioner must produce the documents and initiate FSL proceedings within one month. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Vijayamma v. Gopakumar. N (IA 6/2024 in AS 10/2023) The court allowed Vijayamma's petition to send a disputed demand promissory note to the Forensic Science Laboratory (FSL) for signature and handwriting comparison. Vijayamma, the defendant in an underlying money recovery suit, had consistently denied executing the promissory note, and the court found she was entitled to forensic examination to disprove the plaintiff's claims. The petitioner must produce the documents and initiate FSL proceedings within one month. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court, Kottarakkara All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case