Thajudeen vs Thomas Chacko Advocate - VARGHESE P MATHEW — 100032/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26orderVIIRuleI. Status: for evidence.. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLKM200002882025
Next Hearing
09th June 2026
e-Filing Number
09-06-2025
Filing Number
186/2025
Filing Date
09-06-2025
Registration No
100032/2025
Registration Date
10-06-2025
Court
Sub Court, Kottarakkara
Judge
1-Sub Judge,Kottarakara
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Thajudeen
Adv. Sethu Lekshmi C
Respondent(s)
Thomas Chacko Advocate - VARGHESE P MATHEW
Annamma Thomas
Adv. VARGHESE P MATHEW
Soya Manoj Mathew
Adv. VARGHESE P MATHEW
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Sub Judge,Kottarakara
for evidence.
Issues
Issues
Report on mediation
Report on mediation
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-05-2026 | for evidence. |
| 23-05-2026 | Issues |
| 06-04-2026 | Issues |
| 13-03-2026 | Report on mediation |
| 26-02-2026 | Report on mediation |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Thajudeen v. Thomas Chacko Advocate & Others (Case 100032/2025) Outcome: The petition for temporary injunction was dismissed. The court found that petitioner Thajudeen failed to establish a prima facie case for restraining respondent No. 3 from executing documents regarding a disputed property. The court determined that Thajudeen had not performed his contractual obligations to purchase the property and bore primary responsibility for the transaction's failure, while respondents demonstrated willingness to execute the sale deed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Thajudeen v. Thomas Chacko Advocate & Others (Case 100032/2025) Outcome: The petition for temporary injunction was dismissed. The court found that petitioner Thajudeen failed to establish a prima facie case for restraining respondent No. 3 from executing documents regarding a disputed property. The court determined that Thajudeen had not performed his contractual obligations to purchase the property and bore primary responsibility for the transaction's failure, while respondents demonstrated willingness to execute the sale deed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts