Kunjappy Reji vs Kunjupillai Santhoshgi Advocate - Devesh — 100017/2017
Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section 26. Status: Stayed. Call on. Next hearing: 31st July 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLKM200002512017
Next Hearing
31st July 2026
Filing Number
149/2017
Filing Date
09-10-2017
Registration No
100017/2017
Registration Date
17-10-2017
Court
Sub Court, Kottarakkara
Judge
1-Sub Judge,Kottarakara
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kunjappy Reji
Adv. Krishnakumar R.
Respondent(s)
Kunjupillai Santhoshgi Advocate - Devesh
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Sub Judge,Kottarakara
Stayed. Call on
Stayed. Call on
Adjourned
Call on
Stayed. Call on
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-05-2026 | Stayed. Call on |
| 13-03-2026 | Stayed. Call on |
| 12-02-2026 | Adjourned |
| 31-01-2026 | Call on |
| 29-11-2025 | Stayed. Call on |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: O.S. 17/2017 - Kunjappy Reji v. Kunjupillai Santhoshgi The Subordinate Judge, Kottarakkara ruled on Additional Issue No. 4 regarding proper valuation and court fee payment in this property dispute. Kunjappy Reji sought declaration of title, possession, and perpetual injunction over agricultural land against Kunjupillai Santhoshgi. The court determined the suit should be valued under Section 25(a) read with Section 7(2) of the Kerala Court Fees and Suit Valuation Act, 1959—treating the property as agricultural land with injunction as ancillary relief. The court upheld the plaintiff's valuation methodology as legally sound, rejecting the defendant's argument for higher valuation based on a Rs. 17,00,000 sale agreement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: O.S. 17/2017 - Kunjappy Reji v. Kunjupillai Santhoshgi The Subordinate Judge, Kottarakkara ruled on Additional Issue No. 4 regarding proper valuation and court fee payment in this property dispute. Kunjappy Reji sought declaration of title, possession, and perpetual injunction over agricultural land against Kunjupillai Santhoshgi. The court determined the suit should be valued under Section 25(a) read with Section 7(2) of the Kerala Court Fees and Suit Valuation Act, 1959—treating the property as agricultural land with injunction as ancillary relief. The court upheld the plaintiff's valuation methodology as legally sound, rejecting the defendant's argument for higher valuation based on a Rs. 17,00,000 sale agreement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts