State of Kerala Police vs Aneesh James Advocate - Anilkumar G., Anilkumar G. — 826/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),296(b),3(5). Disposed: Contested--CONTESTED on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed

SC - SESSIONS CASE

CNR: KLKM190001062025

Filing Number

826/2025

Filing Date

31-May-2025

Registration No

826/2025

Registration Date

31-May-2025

Court

Spl Court for SC ST PO AAct cases Kottarakkara

Judge

1-Special Judge

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--CONTESTED

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

247

Police Station

Yeroor PS

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),296(b),3(5)
Sc/st(prevention of Attrocities) Act 1989\ Section 3(1)(s),3(2)(Va)
Crl.mp/1/2026 Classification : Absent Petition Section Aneesh JamesState of Kerala Police

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Kerala Police

    Adv. Santhosh Kumar G.S.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Aneesh James Advocate - Anilkumar G., Anilkumar G.

  2. 2.Sano Thomas

    Adv. SHEFINA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary: Sessions Case 826/2025 Court Decision: The Special Judge acquitted both accused (Aneesh James and Sano Thomas) of charges under SC/ST (POA) Act, finding the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: The court found the prosecution's evidence unreliable, noting that witnesses were related to or friends of the complainant, there was an 11-day delay in filing the complaint without credible explanation, and the accused lacked knowledge of the complainants' caste. The judge also questioned why police didn't register a case on the date of incident despite allegedly being present, and found the accused's word that they didn't know the victims' caste to be "true and correct." This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-May-2026

    Disposed

    Special Judge

  4. 08-May-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    Special Judge

  5. 29-Apr-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    Special Judge

  6. 25-Apr-2026

    For Hearing

    Special Judge

  7. 20-Apr-2026

    Defence Evidence

    Special Judge

  8. 10-Apr-2026

    For Hearing

    Special Judge

  9. 08-Apr-2026

    Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC

    Special Judge

  10. 26-Mar-2026

    Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC

    Special Judge

  11. 18-Mar-2026

    Issue NBW

    Special Judge

  12. 04-Mar-2026

    Issue NBW

    Special Judge

  13. 28-Feb-2026

    Issue NBW

    Special Judge

  14. 19-Feb-2026

    Issue NBW

    Special Judge

  15. 18-Feb-2026

    For evidence

    Special Judge

  16. 22-Dec-2025

    Issue Summons

    Special Judge

  17. 15-Nov-2025

    Adjourned

    Special Judge

  18. 07-Oct-2025

    Trial in the list

    Special Judge

  19. 03-Sep-2025

    Issue Bailable Warrant

    Special Judge

  20. 07-Aug-2025

    For framing charge

    Special Judge

  21. 09-Jul-2025

    Call on

    Special Judge

  22. 31-May-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  23. 31-May-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 826/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Sessions Case 826/2025 Court Decision: The Special Judge acquitted both accused (Aneesh James and Sano Thomas) of charges under SC/ST (POA) Act, finding the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: The court found the prosecution's evidence unreliable, noting that witnesses were related to or friends of the complainant, there was an 11-day delay in filing the complaint without credible explanation, and the accused lacked knowledge of the complainants' caste. The judge also questioned why police didn't register a case on the date of incident despite allegedly being present, and found the accused's word that they didn't know the victims' caste to be "true and correct." This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case