State of Kerala (Excise) vs Vasanthi Advocate - Anuraj T.S. — 101955/2022

Case under Abkari Act Section 8(1),(2). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED U/S 258 BNSS on 04th April 2026.

Case disposed

SC - SESSIONS CASE

CNR: KLKM180017012022

Filing Number

10256/2022

Filing Date

31-Oct-2022

Registration No

101955/2022

Registration Date

31-Oct-2022

Court

Addl.Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Kottarakkara

Judge

1-Addl.Sessions Judge(Abkari Cases)

Decision Date

04-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED U/S 258 BNSS

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

225

Police Station

Sasthamcotta ER

Year

2017

Acts & Sections

Abkari Act Section 8(1),(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Kerala (Excise)

    Adv. Spl. Public Prosecutor

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vasanthi Advocate - Anuraj T.S.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-Apr-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary: State of Kerala v. Vasanthi (Sessions Case 1955/2022) The Additional Sessions Court acquitted Vasanthi of charges under Sections 8(1) and 8(2) of the Kerala Abkari Act for allegedly possessing 10 litres of country-made liquor, finding the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court identified critical procedural violations: failure to examine the custody officer or Thondy Clerk, absence of specimen seal verification, collection of only one sample instead of the mandatory two, unexplained 13-month delay in investigation, 2-year delay in sending samples to the laboratory, and insufficient evidence of exclusive possession over the accused's husband's property. The accused was acquitted and released. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Addl.Sessions Judge(Abkari Cases)

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    Addl.Sessions Judge(Abkari Cases)

  5. 31-Mar-2026

    For Hearing

    Addl.Sessions Judge(Abkari Cases)

  6. 30-Mar-2026

    For hearing under section 232 CRPC

    Addl.Sessions Judge(Abkari Cases)

  7. 25-Mar-2026

    Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC

    Addl.Sessions Judge(Abkari Cases)

  8. 18-Mar-2026

    Call on

    Addl.Sessions Judge(Abkari Cases)

  9. 05-Mar-2026

    For Examination of Witness

    Addl.Sessions Judge(Abkari Cases)

  10. 20-Feb-2026

    Issue Summons

    Addl.Sessions Judge(Abkari Cases)

  11. 12-Feb-2026

    For framing charge

    Addl.Sessions Judge(Abkari Cases)

  12. 31-Oct-2025

    Call on

    Addl.Sessions Judge(Abkari Cases)

  13. 23-Jul-2025

    For framing charge

    Addl.Sessions Judge(Abkari Cases)

  14. 29-Apr-2025

    For framing charge

    Addl.Sessions Judge(Abkari Cases)

  15. 15-Feb-2025

    For framing charge

    Addl.Sessions Judge(Abkari Cases)

  16. 26-Nov-2024

    For framing charge

    Addl.Sessions Judge(Abkari Cases)

  17. 08-Aug-2024

    For framing charge

    Addl.Sessions Judge(Abkari Cases)

  18. 13-Jun-2024

    For framing charge

    Addl.Sessions Judge(Abkari Cases)

  19. 02-Mar-2024

    For framing charge

    Addl.Sessions Judge(Abkari Cases)

  20. 07-Nov-2023

    For framing charge

    Addl.Sessions Judge(Abkari Cases)

  21. 22-Jul-2023

    For framing charge

    Addl.Sessions Judge(Abkari Cases)

  22. 24-Apr-2023

    Adjourned

    Addl.Sessions Judge(Abkari Cases)

  23. 15-Feb-2023

    For framing charge

    Addl.Sessions Judge(Abkari Cases)

  24. 14-Dec-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  25. 31-Oct-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 101955/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Kerala v. Vasanthi (Sessions Case 1955/2022) The Additional Sessions Court acquitted Vasanthi of charges under Sections 8(1) and 8(2) of the Kerala Abkari Act for allegedly possessing 10 litres of country-made liquor, finding the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court identified critical procedural violations: failure to examine the custody officer or Thondy Clerk, absence of specimen seal verification, collection of only one sample instead of the mandatory two, unexplained 13-month delay in investigation, 2-year delay in sending samples to the laboratory, and insufficient evidence of exclusive possession over the accused's husband's property. The accused was acquitted and released. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case