State of Kerala Excise vs Sandhu Krishnan @ Appu Advocate - Pushpanandan S. — 100831/2022
Case under Abkari Act Section 55(g). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED U/S 258 BNSS on 20th April 2026.
SC - SESSIONS CASE
CNR: KLKM180002322022
Filing Number
100831/2022
Filing Date
29-04-2022
Registration No
100831/2022
Registration Date
29-04-2022
Court
Addl.Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Kottarakkara
Judge
1-Addl.Sessions Judge(Abkari Cases)
Decision Date
20th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED U/S 258 BNSS
FIR Details
FIR Number
42
Police Station
Ezhukone ER
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala Excise
Adv. Spl. Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
Sandhu Krishnan @ Appu Advocate - Pushpanandan S.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Addl.Sessions Judge(Abkari Cases)
Disposed
Order/ Judgement
Defence Evidence
For hearing under section 232 CRPC
Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 18-04-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 17-04-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 16-04-2026 | For hearing under section 232 CRPC |
| 13-04-2026 | Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Kerala Excise v. Sandhu Krishnan @ Appu (SC 831/2022) The court acquitted the accused of charges under Section 55(g) of the Kerala Abkari Act for alleged possession of 105 litres of illicit wash. The judgment found critical procedural failures in the prosecution's case, including non-compliance with mandatory sampling, sealing, and custody protocols; unexplained delays between seizure (May 2021) and chemical analysis (January 2022); failure to produce specimen seals for verification; and lack of evidence establishing the accused's conscious possession of the contraband. The court emphasized that strict adherence to tamper-proof procedures is mandatory in excise cases and that dock identification alone cannot establish guilt without corroborative evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Kerala Excise v. Sandhu Krishnan @ Appu (SC 831/2022) The court acquitted the accused of charges under Section 55(g) of the Kerala Abkari Act for alleged possession of 105 litres of illicit wash. The judgment found critical procedural failures in the prosecution's case, including non-compliance with mandatory sampling, sealing, and custody protocols; unexplained delays between seizure (May 2021) and chemical analysis (January 2022); failure to produce specimen seals for verification; and lack of evidence establishing the accused's conscious possession of the contraband. The court emphasized that strict adherence to tamper-proof procedures is mandatory in excise cases and that dock identification alone cannot establish guilt without corroborative evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
More from this court
Addl.Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Kottarakkara All courts →Explore other courts