State of Kerala Excise vs Sandhu Krishnan @ Appu Advocate - Pushpanandan S. — 100831/2022

Case under Abkari Act Section 55(g). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED U/S 258 BNSS on 20th April 2026.

SC - SESSIONS CASE

CNR: KLKM180002322022

Case disposed

Filing Number

100831/2022

Filing Date

29-04-2022

Registration No

100831/2022

Registration Date

29-04-2022

Court

Addl.Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Kottarakkara

Judge

1-Addl.Sessions Judge(Abkari Cases)

Decision Date

20th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED U/S 258 BNSS

FIR Details

FIR Number

42

Police Station

Ezhukone ER

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

Abkari Act Section 55(g)

Petitioner(s)

State of Kerala Excise

Adv. Spl. Public Prosecutor

Respondent(s)

Sandhu Krishnan @ Appu Advocate - Pushpanandan S.

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Addl.Sessions Judge(Abkari Cases)

20-04-2026

Disposed

18-04-2026

Order/ Judgement

17-04-2026

Defence Evidence

16-04-2026

For hearing under section 232 CRPC

13-04-2026

Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC

Final Orders / Judgements

20-04-2026
Judgement

Case Summary: State of Kerala Excise v. Sandhu Krishnan @ Appu (SC 831/2022) The court acquitted the accused of charges under Section 55(g) of the Kerala Abkari Act for alleged possession of 105 litres of illicit wash. The judgment found critical procedural failures in the prosecution's case, including non-compliance with mandatory sampling, sealing, and custody protocols; unexplained delays between seizure (May 2021) and chemical analysis (January 2022); failure to produce specimen seals for verification; and lack of evidence establishing the accused's conscious possession of the contraband. The court emphasized that strict adherence to tamper-proof procedures is mandatory in excise cases and that dock identification alone cannot establish guilt without corroborative evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Kerala Excise v. Sandhu Krishnan @ Appu (SC 831/2022) The court acquitted the accused of charges under Section 55(g) of the Kerala Abkari Act for alleged possession of 105 litres of illicit wash. The judgment found critical procedural failures in the prosecution's case, including non-compliance with mandatory sampling, sealing, and custody protocols; unexplained delays between seizure (May 2021) and chemical analysis (January 2022); failure to produce specimen seals for verification; and lack of evidence establishing the accused's conscious possession of the contraband. The court emphasized that strict adherence to tamper-proof procedures is mandatory in excise cases and that dock identification alone cannot establish guilt without corroborative evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Addl.Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Kottarakkara All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case