State of Kerala Excise vs Shainu Advocate - Jayaprakash. V — 100768/2022

Case under Abkari Act Section 55(g). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED U/S 258 BNSS on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

SC - SESSIONS CASE

CNR: KLKM180002182022

Filing Number

100768/2022

Filing Date

20-Apr-2022

Registration No

100768/2022

Registration Date

20-Apr-2022

Court

Addl.Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Kottarakkara

Judge

1-Addl.Sessions Judge(Abkari Cases)

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED U/S 258 BNSS

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

115

Police Station

Anchal E.R.

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

Abkari Act Section 55(g)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Kerala Excise

    Adv. Spl. Public Prosecutor

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Shainu Advocate - Jayaprakash. V

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Summary of Case 100768/2022 (Sessions Case 768/2022) The Additional Sessions Court, Kollam acquitted accused Shainu of illegal liquor possession charges under Section 55(g) of the Kerala Abkari Act. The court found the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt due to multiple procedural violations: failure to examine custody officials and the Thondy Clerk, delay in producing seized samples (6 days), collection of only one sample instead of mandatory two, unexplained 9-month delay in chemical analysis, and weak dock identification without corroboration. The accused's exclusive possession and conscious control over the contraband were also unestablished. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl.Sessions Judge(Abkari Cases)

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    Addl.Sessions Judge(Abkari Cases)

  5. 23-Mar-2026

    For hearing under section 232 CRPC

    Addl.Sessions Judge(Abkari Cases)

  6. 18-Mar-2026

    Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC

    Addl.Sessions Judge(Abkari Cases)

  7. 13-Mar-2026

    For Examination of Witness

    Addl.Sessions Judge(Abkari Cases)

  8. 26-Feb-2026

    Issue Summons

    Addl.Sessions Judge(Abkari Cases)

  9. 18-Feb-2026

    Call on

    Addl.Sessions Judge(Abkari Cases)

  10. 06-Nov-2025

    For framing charge

    Addl.Sessions Judge(Abkari Cases)

  11. 29-Jul-2025

    For framing charge

    Addl.Sessions Judge(Abkari Cases)

  12. 14-May-2025

    Issue Bailable Warrant

    Addl.Sessions Judge(Abkari Cases)

  13. 20-Feb-2025

    For framing charge

    Addl.Sessions Judge(Abkari Cases)

  14. 05-Dec-2024

    For framing charge

    Addl.Sessions Judge(Abkari Cases)

  15. 22-Aug-2024

    For framing charge

    Addl.Sessions Judge(Abkari Cases)

  16. 21-Jun-2024

    For framing charge

    Addl.Sessions Judge(Abkari Cases)

  17. 03-Jun-2024

    For framing charge

    Addl.Sessions Judge(Abkari Cases)

  18. 22-Feb-2024

    For framing charge

    Addl.Sessions Judge(Abkari Cases)

  19. 28-Oct-2023

    For framing charge

    Addl.Sessions Judge(Abkari Cases)

  20. 18-Jul-2023

    Adjourned

    Addl.Sessions Judge(Abkari Cases)

  21. 19-Apr-2023

    Adjourned

    Addl.Sessions Judge(Abkari Cases)

  22. 10-Feb-2023

    Adjourned

    Addl.Sessions Judge(Abkari Cases)

  23. 09-Dec-2022

    Adjourned

    Addl.Sessions Judge(Abkari Cases)

  24. 07-Oct-2022

    Adjourned

    Addl.Sessions Judge(Abkari Cases)

  25. 22-Jul-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  26. 20-Apr-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 100768/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 100768/2022 (Sessions Case 768/2022) The Additional Sessions Court, Kollam acquitted accused Shainu of illegal liquor possession charges under Section 55(g) of the Kerala Abkari Act. The court found the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt due to multiple procedural violations: failure to examine custody officials and the Thondy Clerk, delay in producing seized samples (6 days), collection of only one sample instead of mandatory two, unexplained 9-month delay in chemical analysis, and weak dock identification without corroboration. The accused's exclusive possession and conscious control over the contraband were also unestablished. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case