SI of police Pathanapuram vs Pushpavalli Advocate - MILAD M — 100784/2020
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b) 324,506(ii) 34. Disposed: Contested--AQUITTED on 27th April 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLKM160030452020
Filing Number
100784/2020
Filing Date
10-Nov-2020
Registration No
100784/2020
Registration Date
10-Nov-2020
Court
Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Pathanapuram
Judge
1-Judl.First Class Magistrate
Decision Date
27-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--AQUITTED
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
1530
Police Station
Pathanapuram PS
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SI of police Pathanapuram
Adv. Salil Raj S
-
2.Ratnamma
Respondent(s)
-
1.Pushpavalli Advocate - MILAD M
-
2.Praveen
Adv. MILAD M
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
27-Apr-2026
JudgementView PDF
Case Summary: 100784/2020 Court Decision: The Judicial First Class Magistrate, Pathanapuram acquitted both accused (Pushpavalli and Praveen) of charges under IPC sections 294(b) (obscene words), 324 (voluntarily causing hurt), and 506(i) (criminal intimidation) on April 27, 2026. Key Reasoning: The court found insufficient evidence to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Critical weaknesses included: the primary witness failed to specify which accused threw the stone; unexplained two-day delay in FIR registration; two cited eyewitnesses turned hostile and denied witnessing the incident; the husband's corroborating testimony was dismissed as hearsay; and essential legal ingredients for the offences were not satisfactorily proven. The court gave the accused the benefit of doubt and discharged their bail bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Apr-2026
Disposed
Judl.First Class Magistrate
-
27-Apr-2026
Disposed
Judl.First Class Magistrate
-
24-Apr-2026
Order/ Judgement
Judl.First Class Magistrate
-
21-Apr-2026
Order/ Judgement
Judl.First Class Magistrate
-
07-Apr-2026
For Hearing
Judl.First Class Magistrate
-
30-Mar-2026
For Hearing
Judl.First Class Magistrate
-
24-Mar-2026
For Hearing
Judl.First Class Magistrate
-
16-Mar-2026
For Hearing
Judl.First Class Magistrate
-
13-Mar-2026
For 313 CrPC
Judl.First Class Magistrate
-
04-Mar-2026
For 313 CrPC
Judl.First Class Magistrate
-
13-Feb-2026
Repeat NBW to CWs
Judl.First Class Magistrate
-
30-Jan-2026
Show casue to Investigating Officer
Judl.First Class Magistrate
-
07-Jan-2026
Show casue to Investigating Officer
Judl.First Class Magistrate
-
11-Dec-2025
Await summons
Judl.First Class Magistrate
-
14-Nov-2025
Issue NBW to Cw
Judl.First Class Magistrate
-
22-Oct-2025
Repeat summons to CWs
Judl.First Class Magistrate
-
06-Oct-2025
Repeat summons to CWs
Judl.First Class Magistrate
-
18-Sep-2025
Repeat summons to CWs
Judl.First Class Magistrate
-
06-Aug-2025
Issue summon to CWs.
Judl.First Class Magistrate
-
21-Jul-2025
Appearance of Petitioner
Judl.First Class Magistrate
-
16-Jun-2025
Issu summons to CWs.
Judl.First Class Magistrate
-
18-Mar-2025
Appearance Of Parties
Judl.First Class Magistrate
-
18-Feb-2025
Await report
Judl.First Class Magistrate
-
08-Jan-2025
Issu summons to CWs.
Judl.First Class Magistrate
-
25-Nov-2024
Appearance Of Parties
Judl.First Class Magistrate
-
21-Oct-2024
Appearance Of Parties
Judl.First Class Magistrate
-
23-Sep-2024
Issue summonsed to accused
Judl.First Class Magistrate
-
27-Aug-2024
No sitting notified
Judl.First Class Magistrate
-
12-Mar-2024
Issue summonsed to accused
Judl.First Class Magistrate
-
03-Oct-2023
No sitting notified
Judl.First Class Magistrate
-
05-Apr-2023
Issue Summons
Judl.First Class Magistrate
-
19-Aug-2022
Issue Summons
Judl.First Class Magistrate
-
11-Apr-2022
Issue Summons
Judl.First Class Magistrate
-
26-Nov-2021
Issue Summons
Judl.First Class Magistrate
-
24-Jul-2021
Adjourned
Judl.First Class Magistrate
-
04-Feb-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Nov-2020
Case filed
Registration No. 100784/2020
Case Summary: 100784/2020 Court Decision: The Judicial First Class Magistrate, Pathanapuram acquitted both accused (Pushpavalli and Praveen) of charges under IPC sections 294(b) (obscene words), 324 (voluntarily causing hurt), and 506(i) (criminal intimidation) on April 27, 2026. Key Reasoning: The court found insufficient evidence to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Critical weaknesses included: the primary witness failed to specify which accused threw the stone; unexplained two-day delay in FIR registration; two cited eyewitnesses turned hostile and denied witnessing the incident; the husband's corroborating testimony was dismissed as hearsay; and essential legal ingredients for the offences were not satisfactorily proven. The court gave the accused the benefit of doubt and discharged their bail bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts