Podiyan vs Radhamany Advocate - Harikrishnan.G — 100172/2015

Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section 26. Status: For Steps. Next hearing: 07th July 2026.

For Steps Next hearing 07-Jul-2026

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLKM130002192015

Filing Number

190/2015

Filing Date

18-Apr-2015

Registration No

100172/2015

Registration Date

18-Apr-2015

Court

Munsiff Court, Punalur

Judge

1-Munsiff, Punalur

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section 26
Ia/3/2022 Classification : Sanction Petition Section PodiyanRadhamany
Ia/4/2022 Classification : Sanction Petition Section PodiyanRadhamany
Ia/5/2023 Classification : Carbon Copy Application Section PodiyanRadhamany

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Podiyan

    Adv. S.R. Amrit

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Radhamany Advocate - Harikrishnan.G

Case History

  1. 07-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 04-Jun-2026

    For Steps

    Munsiff, Punalur

  3. 21-May-2026

    For Steps

    Munsiff, Punalur

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Await report

    Munsiff, Punalur

  5. 17-Feb-2026

    Await report

    Munsiff, Punalur

  6. 24-Jan-2026

    For reports

    Munsiff, Punalur

  7. 09-Jan-2026

    Orders in IA

    Munsiff, Punalur

  8. 08-Dec-2025

    For hearing on IA

    Munsiff, Punalur

  9. 18-Nov-2025

    For hearing on IA

    Munsiff, Punalur

  10. 06-Nov-2025

    Verify and report

    Munsiff, Punalur

  11. 25-Oct-2025

    For hearing on IA

    Munsiff, Punalur

  12. 04-Oct-2025

    Verify and report

    Munsiff, Punalur

  13. 23-Sep-2025

    Verify and report

    Munsiff, Punalur

  14. 26-Aug-2025

    Verify and report

    Munsiff, Punalur

  15. 22-Jul-2025

    Stay report

    Munsiff, Punalur

  16. 28-Jun-2025

    Stay report

    Munsiff, Punalur

  17. 11-Jun-2025

    Stay report

    Munsiff, Punalur

  18. 20-May-2025

    Listed to

    Munsiff, Punalur

  19. 22-Mar-2025

    Verify and report

    Munsiff, Punalur

  20. 20-Feb-2025

    Verify and report

    Munsiff, Punalur

  21. 31-Jan-2025

    Stayed by High Court

    Munsiff, Punalur

  22. 21-Dec-2024

    Stayed by High Court

    Munsiff, Punalur

  23. 28-Nov-2024

    Pre trial steps

    Munsiff, Punalur

  24. 14-Nov-2024

    Pre trial steps

    Munsiff, Punalur

  25. 23-Oct-2024

    Call on

    Munsiff, Punalur

  26. 07-Oct-2024

    Return of notice

    Munsiff, Punalur

  27. 12-Sep-2024

    Call on

    Munsiff, Punalur

  28. 12-Sep-2024

    Restored

    Munsiff, Punalur

  29. 12-Sep-2024

    Return of notice

    Munsiff, Punalur

  30. 30-Jun-2023

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary: OS. 172/2015 - Podiyan v. Radhamany Outcome: Suit ALLOWED in favor of the plaintiff. The court declared gift deed No. 1860/2009 void ab initio (invalid from inception), found title and possession with the plaintiff, and granted permanent prohibitory and mandatory injunctions restraining the defendant from interfering with the plaintiff's property and directing her to vacate within six months. The court held that the defendant exploited the plaintiff's deaf-dumb condition and bilateral profound hearing loss (70%+ disability) to obtain the gift deed without complying with Registration Rules requiring special procedures for disabled persons, thereby committing fraud. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  31. 30-Jun-2023

    Disposed

    Munsiff, Punalur

  32. 29-Jun-2023

    Order/Judgement

    Munsiff, Punalur

  33. 13-Jun-2023

    Order/Judgement

    Munsiff, Punalur

  34. 30-May-2023

    For Hearing

    Munsiff, Punalur

  35. 23-May-2023

    For Hearing

    Munsiff, Punalur

  36. 04-Apr-2023

    For Hearing

    Munsiff, Punalur

  37. 28-Mar-2023

    For Hearing

    Munsiff, Punalur

  38. 16-Mar-2023

    For Hearing

    Munsiff, Punalur

  39. 03-Mar-2023

    For Hearing

    Munsiff, Punalur

  40. 17-Feb-2023

    For Hearing

    Munsiff, Punalur

  41. 09-Feb-2023

    For Hearing

    Munsiff, Punalur

  42. 25-Jan-2023

    Further evidence

    Munsiff, Punalur

  43. 24-Jan-2023

    Further evidence

    Munsiff, Punalur

  44. 23-Jan-2023

    For evidence

    Munsiff, Punalur

  45. 18-Jan-2023

    For evidence

    Munsiff, Punalur

  46. 17-Jan-2023

    For evidence

    Munsiff, Punalur

  47. 13-Jan-2023

    For evidence

    Munsiff, Punalur

  48. 06-Jan-2023

    For evidence

    Munsiff, Punalur

  49. 05-Jan-2023

    For evidence

    Munsiff, Punalur

  50. 04-Jan-2023

    For evidence

    Munsiff, Punalur

  51. 19-Dec-2022

    for evidence/

    Munsiff, Punalur

  52. 12-Dec-2022

    for evidence/

    Munsiff, Punalur

  53. 29-Nov-2022

    for evidence/

    Munsiff, Punalur

  54. 28-Nov-2022

    For commission report

    Munsiff, Punalur

  55. 26-Nov-2022

    For commission report

    Munsiff, Punalur

  56. 22-Nov-2022

    Listed to

    Munsiff, Punalur

  57. 19-Nov-2022

    Listed to

    Munsiff, Punalur

  58. 17-Nov-2022

    Listed to

    Munsiff, Punalur

  59. 10-Oct-2022

    Listed to

    Munsiff, Punalur

  60. 20-Sep-2022

    Pre trial steps

    Munsiff, Punalur

  61. 27-Jul-2022

    Pre trial steps

    Munsiff, Punalur

  62. 20-Jun-2022

    Call on

    Munsiff, Punalur

  63. 25-Mar-2022

    Call on

    Munsiff, Punalur

  64. 22-Jan-2022

    Call on

    Munsiff, Punalur

  65. 10-Dec-2021

    Call on

    Munsiff, Punalur

  66. 20-Sep-2021

    Call on

    Munsiff, Punalur

  67. 20-Sep-2021

    Restored

    Munsiff, Punalur

  68. 20-Sep-2021

    Call on

    Munsiff, Punalur

  69. 19-Feb-2020

    JudgementView PDF

  70. 19-Feb-2020

    Disposed

    Munsiff, Punalur

  71. 07-Feb-2020

    Order/Judgement

    Munsiff, Punalur

  72. 03-Feb-2020

    For Hearing

    Munsiff, Punalur

  73. 20-Nov-2019

    Listed to

    Munsiff, Punalur

  74. 31-Oct-2019

    Pre trial steps

    Munsiff, Punalur

  75. 16-Oct-2019

    Pre trial steps

    Munsiff, Punalur

  76. 19-Sep-2019

    Issues

    Munsiff, Punalur

  77. 31-Aug-2019

    Written Statement

    Munsiff, Punalur

  78. 03-Jun-2019

    Objection

    Munsiff, Punalur

  79. 08-Feb-2019

    For hearing on IA

    Munsiff, Punalur

  80. 19-Dec-2018

    For hearing on IA

    Munsiff, Punalur

  81. 05-Nov-2018

    No sitting notified

    Munsiff, Punalur

  82. 13-Aug-2018

    Written Statement

    Munsiff, Punalur

  83. 16-Jun-2018

    No sitting notified

    Munsiff, Punalur

  84. 28-Mar-2018

    Written Statement

    Munsiff, Punalur

  85. 26-Feb-2018

    Call on

    Munsiff, Punalur

  86. 19-Jan-2018

    For Hearing

    Munsiff, Punalur

  87. 19-Dec-2017

    No sitting notified

    Munsiff, Punalur

  88. 18-Nov-2017

    For hearing on IA

    Munsiff, Punalur

  89. 26-Sep-2017

    For hearing on IA

    Munsiff, Punalur

  90. 19-Jul-2017

    For Steps

    Munsiff, Punalur

  91. 05-Apr-2017

    No sitting notified

    Munsiff, Punalur

  92. 09-Mar-2017

    For Steps

    Munsiff, Punalur

  93. 22-Feb-2017

    Call on

    Munsiff, Punalur

  94. 28-Nov-2016

    Call on

    Munsiff, Punalur

  95. 22-Sep-2016

    For reports

    Munsiff, Punalur

  96. 28-Jul-2016

    Call on

    Munsiff, Punalur

  97. 02-Jun-2016

    Call on

    Munsiff, Punalur

  98. 23-Mar-2016

    Call on

    Munsiff, Punalur

  99. 28-Jan-2016

    Call on

    Munsiff, Punalur

  100. 12-Nov-2015

    Call on

    Munsiff, Punalur

  101. 30-Oct-2015

    Call on

    Munsiff, Punalur

  102. 17-Oct-2015

    Call on

    Munsiff, Punalur

  103. 29-Sep-2015

    For hearing on IA

    Munsiff, Punalur

  104. 08-Sep-2015

    For hearing on IA

    Munsiff, Punalur

  105. 23-Jul-2015

    Written Statement

    Munsiff, Punalur

  106. 10-Jun-2015

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  107. 18-Apr-2015

    Case filed

    Registration No. 100172/2015

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: OS. 172/2015 - Podiyan v. Radhamany Outcome: Suit ALLOWED in favor of the plaintiff. The court declared gift deed No. 1860/2009 void ab initio (invalid from inception), found title and possession with the plaintiff, and granted permanent prohibitory and mandatory injunctions restraining the defendant from interfering with the plaintiff's property and directing her to vacate within six months. The court held that the defendant exploited the plaintiff's deaf-dumb condition and bilateral profound hearing loss (70%+ disability) to obtain the gift deed without complying with Registration Rules requiring special procedures for disabled persons, thereby committing fraud. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case