P. Rajendran vs A. Nazar — 100091/2016

Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section 26. Status: For Hearing. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.

For Hearing Next hearing 08-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLKM130001252016

Filing Number

100116/2016

Filing Date

22-Feb-2016

Registration No

100091/2016

Registration Date

22-Feb-2016

Court

Munsiff Court, Punalur

Judge

1-Munsiff, Punalur

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section 26

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.P. Rajendran

    Adv. G. Sudhakaran

  2. 2.Sreekala Rajendran

    Adv. S S Binu

  3. 3.Akhila Raj

    Adv. S S Binu

  4. 4.Kiran Raj

    Adv. S S Binu

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.A. Nazar

Case History

  1. 08-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 04-Jun-2026

    For Hearing

    Munsiff, Punalur

  3. 29-May-2026

    For Hearing

    Munsiff, Punalur

  4. 04-Apr-2026

    For Hearing

    Munsiff, Punalur

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    For Hearing

    Munsiff, Punalur

  6. 19-Mar-2026

    Further evidence

    Munsiff, Punalur

  7. 13-Mar-2026

    For Steps

    Munsiff, Punalur

  8. 02-Mar-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    Munsiff, Punalur

  9. 26-Feb-2026

    For hearing on IA

    Munsiff, Punalur

  10. 21-Feb-2026

    Objection

    Munsiff, Punalur

  11. 17-Feb-2026

    For Hearing

    Munsiff, Punalur

  12. 11-Feb-2026

    For evidence

    Munsiff, Punalur

  13. 04-Feb-2026

    For return of summons

    Munsiff, Punalur

  14. 28-Jan-2026

    Defence Evidence

    Munsiff, Punalur

  15. 22-Jan-2026

    For cross examination.

    Munsiff, Punalur

  16. 17-Jan-2026

    Further evidence

    Munsiff, Punalur

  17. 12-Jan-2026

    For evidence

    Munsiff, Punalur

  18. 05-Jan-2026

    For evidence

    Munsiff, Punalur

  19. 22-Nov-2025

    Listed to

    Munsiff, Punalur

  20. 24-Oct-2025

    Pre trial steps

    Munsiff, Punalur

  21. 24-Sep-2025

    Pre trial steps

    Munsiff, Punalur

  22. 25-Aug-2025

    OrderView PDF

    Summary of Case 100091/2016 Outcome: Application ALLOWED. The attachment over the mortgaged property is hereby VACATED, with intimation to be issued to the Sub-Registrar. Key Facts: Kerala Gramin Bank sought to lift an attachment placed on a property mortgaged to it as collateral security for loans. The 2nd respondent (A. Nazar) had created an equitable mortgage on the property in 2010 and later availed additional loans in 2013. After the 2nd respondent defaulted on repayment from 2014 onwards, the bank initiated debt recovery proceedings. However, the 1st respondent (P. Rajendran) obtained a court attachment on the same property in March 2016—years after the bank's mortgage was created. The court found that since the bank held a first charge over the property from 2010, the subsequent attachment in 2016 could not supersede the bank's prior rights, and therefore vacated the attachment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  23. 25-Aug-2025

    Issues

    Munsiff, Punalur

  24. 18-Aug-2025

    Order/Judgement

    Munsiff, Punalur

  25. 02-Aug-2025

    For hearing on IA

    Munsiff, Punalur

  26. 02-Jul-2025

    For hearing on IA

    Munsiff, Punalur

  27. 13-Jun-2025

    For Hearing

    Munsiff, Punalur

  28. 11-Jun-2025

    Bound over

    Munsiff, Punalur

  29. 17-Mar-2025

    For evidence

    Munsiff, Punalur

  30. 19-Feb-2025

    For evidence

    Munsiff, Punalur

  31. 06-Jan-2025

    For Steps

    Munsiff, Punalur

  32. 29-Nov-2024

    For evidence

    Munsiff, Punalur

  33. 11-Oct-2024

    For evidence

    Munsiff, Punalur

  34. 29-Aug-2024

    For evidence

    Munsiff, Punalur

  35. 14-Aug-2024

    For evidence

    Munsiff, Punalur

  36. 04-Jul-2024

    For evidence

    Munsiff, Punalur

  37. 25-May-2024

    For evidence

    Munsiff, Punalur

  38. 04-Mar-2024

    For evidence

    Munsiff, Punalur

  39. 01-Feb-2024

    For hearing under section 232 CRPC

    Munsiff, Punalur

  40. 16-Jan-2024

    For hearing on IA

    Munsiff, Punalur

  41. 07-Nov-2023

    For hearing on IA

    Munsiff, Punalur

  42. 16-Sep-2023

    For hearing on IA

    Munsiff, Punalur

  43. 25-Jul-2023

    Objection

    Munsiff, Punalur

  44. 05-Jun-2023

    Objection

    Munsiff, Punalur

  45. 10-Mar-2023

    Objection

    Munsiff, Punalur

  46. 11-Jan-2023

    Referred to Mediator

    Munsiff, Punalur

  47. 10-Nov-2022

    Appearance Of Parties

    Munsiff, Punalur

  48. 29-Oct-2022

    Call with IA

    Munsiff, Punalur

  49. 17-Aug-2022

    Call with IA

    Munsiff, Punalur

  50. 06-Jun-2022

    Call with IA

    Munsiff, Punalur

  51. 18-Mar-2022

    Call with IA

    Munsiff, Punalur

  52. 26-Feb-2022

    Call with IA

    Munsiff, Punalur

  53. 10-Feb-2022

    Call with IA

    Munsiff, Punalur

  54. 06-Jan-2022

    Call with IA

    Munsiff, Punalur

  55. 09-Nov-2021

    Call on

    Munsiff, Punalur

  56. 08-Sep-2021

    Call on

    Munsiff, Punalur

  57. 28-Jun-2021

    Call on

    Munsiff, Punalur

  58. 16-Mar-2021

    Call on

    Munsiff, Punalur

  59. 13-Jan-2021

    Call on

    Munsiff, Punalur

  60. 16-Nov-2020

    Call on

    Munsiff, Punalur

  61. 23-Sep-2020

    Call on

    Munsiff, Punalur

  62. 11-Aug-2020

    Call on

    Munsiff, Punalur

  63. 15-Jun-2020

    Call on

    Munsiff, Punalur

  64. 01-Apr-2020

    Call on

    Munsiff, Punalur

  65. 03-Mar-2020

    Call on

    Munsiff, Punalur

  66. 18-Jan-2020

    Call on

    Munsiff, Punalur

  67. 04-Dec-2019

    Call on

    Munsiff, Punalur

  68. 25-Oct-2019

    Call on

    Munsiff, Punalur

  69. 03-Oct-2019

    Call on

    Munsiff, Punalur

  70. 26-Aug-2019

    Restored

    Munsiff, Punalur

  71. 22-Aug-2016

    Order Number 1View PDF

  72. 22-Aug-2016

    Disposed

    Munsiff, Punalur

  73. 06-Aug-2016

    Order/ Judgement

    Munsiff, Punalur

  74. 20-Jul-2016

    For Hearing

    Munsiff, Punalur

  75. 27-May-2016

    for evidence/

    Munsiff, Punalur

  76. 08-Mar-2016

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  77. 22-Feb-2016

    Case filed

    Registration No. 100091/2016

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 100091/2016 Outcome: Application ALLOWED. The attachment over the mortgaged property is hereby VACATED, with intimation to be issued to the Sub-Registrar. Key Facts: Kerala Gramin Bank sought to lift an attachment placed on a property mortgaged to it as collateral security for loans. The 2nd respondent (A. Nazar) had created an equitable mortgage on the property in 2010 and later availed additional loans in 2013. After the 2nd respondent defaulted on repayment from 2014 onwards, the bank initiated debt recovery proceedings. However, the 1st respondent (P. Rajendran) obtained a court attachment on the same property in March 2016—years after the bank's mortgage was created. The court found that since the bank held a first charge over the property from 2010, the subsequent attachment in 2016 could not supersede the bank's prior rights, and therefore vacated the attachment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case