Sudhakumari vs Shajahan — 100384/2023
Case under Motor Vehicle Act \ Section 140,165. Disposed: Contested--AWARD PASSED on 06th April 2026.
OP (MV) - ORIGINAL PETITION (MOTOR VEHICLES)
CNR: KLKM120004732023
e-Filing Number
05-07-2023
Filing Number
453/2023
Filing Date
06-07-2023
Registration No
100384/2023
Registration Date
06-07-2023
Court
Motor Accident Claims Tribunal ,Punalur
Judge
1-Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal/Addl.District and Sessions Judge, Punalur
Decision Date
06th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--AWARD PASSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sudhakumari
Adv. Anees. T
Respondent(s)
Shajahan
United India Insurance Co Ltd
Adv. B. Venugopal
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal/Addl.District and Sessions Judge, Punalur
Disposed
Order/Judgement
FOR HEARING
return of notice
No sitting notified
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 23-03-2026 | Order/Judgement |
| 13-03-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 11-02-2026 | return of notice |
| 16-12-2025 | No sitting notified |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal awarded Sudhakumari ₹2,88,080 in compensation after she was injured in a motorcycle collision caused by the first respondent's rash and negligent riding. The tribunal found the first respondent liable based on police charge sheet evidence and held the insurer (United India Insurance) statutorily liable to indemnify the owner, awarding compensation for loss of earnings, medical expenses, pain and suffering, and functional disability at 6%. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal awarded Sudhakumari ₹2,88,080 in compensation after she was injured in a motorcycle collision caused by the first respondent's rash and negligent riding. The tribunal found the first respondent liable based on police charge sheet evidence and held the insurer (United India Insurance) statutorily liable to indemnify the owner, awarding compensation for loss of earnings, medical expenses, pain and suffering, and functional disability at 6%. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts