Sudhakumari vs Shajahan — 100384/2023

Case under Motor Vehicle Act \ Section 140,165. Disposed: Contested--AWARD PASSED on 06th April 2026.

Case disposed

OP (MV) - ORIGINAL PETITION (MOTOR VEHICLES)

CNR: KLKM120004732023

e-Filing Number

05-07-2023

Filing Number

453/2023

Filing Date

06-Jul-2023

Registration No

100384/2023

Registration Date

06-Jul-2023

Court

Motor Accident Claims Tribunal ,Punalur

Judge

1-Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal/Addl.District and Sessions Judge, Punalur

Decision Date

06-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--AWARD PASSED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicle Act \ Section 140,165

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sudhakumari

    Adv. Anees. T

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Shajahan

  2. 2.United India Insurance Co Ltd

    Adv. B. Venugopal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Apr-2026

    Final OrderView PDF

    The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal awarded Sudhakumari ₹2,88,080 in compensation after she was injured in a motorcycle collision caused by the first respondent's rash and negligent riding. The tribunal found the first respondent liable based on police charge sheet evidence and held the insurer (United India Insurance) statutorily liable to indemnify the owner, awarding compensation for loss of earnings, medical expenses, pain and suffering, and functional disability at 6%. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal/Addl.District and Sessions Judge, Punalur

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Order/Judgement

    Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal/Addl.District and Sessions Judge, Punalur

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    For Hearing

    Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal/Addl.District and Sessions Judge, Punalur

  6. 11-Feb-2026

    return of notice

    Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal/Addl.District and Sessions Judge, Punalur

  7. 16-Dec-2025

    No sitting notified

    Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal/Addl.District and Sessions Judge, Punalur

  8. 01-Nov-2025

    No sitting notified

    Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal/Addl.District and Sessions Judge, Punalur

  9. 18-Oct-2025

    call on

    Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal/Addl.District and Sessions Judge, Punalur

  10. 17-Sep-2025

    return of notice.

    Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal/Addl.District and Sessions Judge, Punalur

  11. 30-Aug-2025

    No sitting notified

    Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal/Addl.District and Sessions Judge, Punalur

  12. 25-Jul-2025

    No sitting notified

    Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal/Addl.District and Sessions Judge, Punalur

  13. 18-Mar-2025

    Written Statement

    Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal/Addl.District and Sessions Judge, Punalur

  14. 15-Nov-2024

    Written Statement

    Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal/Addl.District and Sessions Judge, Punalur

  15. 17-Aug-2024

    Written Statement

    Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal/Addl.District and Sessions Judge, Punalur

  16. 17-Aug-2024

    Written Statement

    Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal/Addl.District and Sessions Judge, Punalur

  17. 11-Jun-2024

    Written Statement

    Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal/Addl.District and Sessions Judge, Punalur

  18. 03-Apr-2024

    Written Statement

    Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal/Addl.District and Sessions Judge, Punalur

  19. 04-Jan-2024

    Written Statement

    Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal/Addl.District and Sessions Judge, Punalur

  20. 22-Aug-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  21. 06-Jul-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 100384/2023

casestatus.in Summary

The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal awarded Sudhakumari ₹2,88,080 in compensation after she was injured in a motorcycle collision caused by the first respondent's rash and negligent riding. The tribunal found the first respondent liable based on police charge sheet evidence and held the insurer (United India Insurance) statutorily liable to indemnify the owner, awarding compensation for loss of earnings, medical expenses, pain and suffering, and functional disability at 6%. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case