State of Kerala vs A1 Midhun Bose — 100533/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 406,418,420,34. Status: For framing of charge. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLKM100021442022
Filing Number
1001331/2022
Filing Date
21-Nov-2022
Registration No
100533/2022
Registration Date
21-Nov-2022
Court
Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-III, Kollam
Judge
1-Judicial Magistrate of the First Class-III
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
635
Police Station
Kollam West
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Kerala
Respondent(s)
-
1.A1 Midhun Bose
-
2.A2 Vijayabose
-
3.A3 Vijayadas
Case History
-
16-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
12-May-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: State of Kerala v. A1 Midhun Bose, A2 Vijayabose, A3 Vijayadas Outcome: The discharge petition filed by the three accused under Section 239 CRPC was dismissed. The court found a prima facie case against the accused for offences under IPC Sections 420 (cheating), 418 (criminal breach of trust), and 406 (criminal breach of trust) r/w 34 (common intention). The complainant alleged the accused fraudulently induced him to pay ₹1,65,000 under false promises of securing foreign employment visas, which were never delivered. The court held that while the accused's defence claims (regarding visa expenses and partial refunds) may be valid, such matters must be tested during trial, not at the discharge stage. The court determined sufficient grounds existed to proceed with prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-May-2026
For framing of charge
Judicial Magistrate of the First Class-III
-
29-Apr-2026
For Orders in Ea
Judicial Magistrate of the First Class-III
-
28-Mar-2026
For hearing in Cmp
Judicial Magistrate of the First Class-III
-
13-Mar-2026
For hearing in Cmp
Judicial Magistrate of the First Class-III
-
20-Feb-2026
For hearing in Cmp
Judicial Magistrate of the First Class-III
-
16-Jan-2026
For Hearing
Judicial Magistrate of the First Class-III
-
30-Dec-2025
For hearing in Cmp
Judicial Magistrate of the First Class-III
-
26-Nov-2025
For hearing in Cmp
Judicial Magistrate of the First Class-III
-
14-Nov-2025
For Hearing
Judicial Magistrate of the First Class-III
-
10-Oct-2025
For framing charge
Judicial Magistrate of the First Class-III
-
03-Oct-2025
For framing charge
Judicial Magistrate of the First Class-III
-
24-Sep-2025
For framing charge
Judicial Magistrate of the First Class-III
-
02-Sep-2025
For framing of charge
Judicial Magistrate of the First Class-III
-
30-Jun-2025
Return of summons
Judicial Magistrate of the First Class-III
-
26-May-2025
Return of summons
Judicial Magistrate of the First Class-III
-
24-Feb-2025
Return of summons
Temporary Judl.I Class Magistrate
-
10-Dec-2024
Return of summons
Temporary Judl.I Class Magistrate
-
07-Aug-2024
Return of summons
Temporary Judl.I Class Magistrate
-
30-May-2024
Return of summons
Temporary Judl.I Class Magistrate
-
29-Apr-2024
Repeat Summons
Temporary Judl.I Class Magistrate
-
20-Dec-2023
Repeat Summons
Temporary Judl.I Class Magistrate
-
21-Oct-2023
Repeat Summons
Temporary Judl.I Class Magistrate
-
14-Jul-2023
Repeat Summons
Temporary Judl.I Class Magistrate
-
19-May-2023
Issue summonsed to accused
-
03-Mar-2023
Issue summonsed to accused
Temporary Judl.I Class Magistrate
-
22-Dec-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Nov-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 100533/2022
Case Summary: State of Kerala v. A1 Midhun Bose, A2 Vijayabose, A3 Vijayadas Outcome: The discharge petition filed by the three accused under Section 239 CRPC was dismissed. The court found a prima facie case against the accused for offences under IPC Sections 420 (cheating), 418 (criminal breach of trust), and 406 (criminal breach of trust) r/w 34 (common intention). The complainant alleged the accused fraudulently induced him to pay ₹1,65,000 under false promises of securing foreign employment visas, which were never delivered. The court held that while the accused's defence claims (regarding visa expenses and partial refunds) may be valid, such matters must be tested during trial, not at the discharge stage. The court determined sufficient grounds existed to proceed with prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts