State of Kerala vs Arshad — 100275/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498-A,506(i),323,34,294(b). Disposed: Uncontested--ACQUITTED U/S 271 BNSS on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CALENDAR CASE

CNR: KLKM100020892023

e-Filing Number

26-06-2023

Filing Number

102069/2023

Filing Date

25-Jul-2023

Registration No

100275/2023

Registration Date

25-Jul-2023

Court

Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-III, Kollam

Judge

1-Judicial Magistrate of the First Class-III

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ACQUITTED U/S 271 BNSS

Last updated 30-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

232

Police Station

Pallithottam

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 498-A,506(i),323,34,294(b)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Kerala

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Arshad

  2. 2.Ajmal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Final OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: State of Kerala v. Arshad and Ajmal (Calendar Case No. 275/2023) The Kollam First Class Magistrate Court acquitted accused Arshad and Ajmal of charges under IPC sections 294(b), 323, 506(i), and 498A r/w 34, finding them not guilty. The prosecution's key witnesses—the defacto complainant (wife) and her mother—retracted their allegations, testifying that no offence occurred and that the parties had settled the matrimonial dispute. The court found insufficient evidence to prove the alleged domestic violence incident and cancelled their bail bonds, releasing them from custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate of the First Class-III

  4. 29-Apr-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    Judicial Magistrate of the First Class-III

  5. 27-Apr-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    Judicial Magistrate of the First Class-III

  6. 25-Apr-2026

    Defence Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate of the First Class-III

  7. 18-Apr-2026

    Appearance Of Parties

    Judicial Magistrate of the First Class-III

  8. 04-Apr-2026

    Return of summons

    Judicial Magistrate of the First Class-III

  9. 12-Mar-2026

    For Examination of Witness

    Judicial Magistrate of the First Class-III

  10. 12-Feb-2026

    For return of summons

    Judicial Magistrate of the First Class-III

  11. 05-Feb-2026

    For framing of charge

    Judicial Magistrate of the First Class-III

  12. 31-Dec-2025

    No sitting notified

    Judicial Magistrate of the First Class-III

  13. 28-Nov-2025

    Return of warrant

    Judicial Magistrate of the First Class-III

  14. 22-Oct-2025

    Return of warrant

    Judicial Magistrate of the First Class-III

  15. 16-Sep-2025

    No sitting notified

    Judicial Magistrate of the First Class-III

  16. 13-Aug-2025

    Return of warrant

    Judicial Magistrate of the First Class-III

  17. 30-Jun-2025

    Appearance of Accused

    Judicial Magistrate of the First Class-III

  18. 23-Apr-2025

    Appearance of Accused

    Temporary Judl.I Class Magistrate

  19. 08-Apr-2025

    Appearance of Accused

    Temporary Judl.I Class Magistrate

  20. 31-Mar-2025

    Appearance of Accused

    Temporary Judl.I Class Magistrate

  21. 20-Dec-2024

    Appearance of Accused

    Temporary Judl.I Class Magistrate

  22. 29-Jul-2024

    Appearance of Accused

    Temporary Judl.I Class Magistrate

  23. 27-May-2024

    Appearance of Accused

    Temporary Judl.I Class Magistrate

  24. 29-Jan-2024

    Appearance of Accused

    Temporary Judl.I Class Magistrate

  25. 23-Aug-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  26. 25-Jul-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 100275/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Kerala v. Arshad and Ajmal (Calendar Case No. 275/2023) The Kollam First Class Magistrate Court acquitted accused Arshad and Ajmal of charges under IPC sections 294(b), 323, 506(i), and 498A r/w 34, finding them not guilty. The prosecution's key witnesses—the defacto complainant (wife) and her mother—retracted their allegations, testifying that no offence occurred and that the parties had settled the matrimonial dispute. The court found insufficient evidence to prove the alleged domestic violence incident and cancelled their bail bonds, releasing them from custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case