State of kerala police vs Raju and another Advocate - MURALI T — 400141/2019
Case under Railways Act 1989 \ Section 153,174. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED on 27th March 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLKM070010392019
Filing Number
400141/2019
Filing Date
28-11-2019
Registration No
400141/2019
Registration Date
28-11-2019
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court Kollam
Judge
1-Chief Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
27th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of kerala police
Respondent(s)
Raju and another Advocate - MURALI T
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Chief Judicial Magistrate
Disposed
Call on
Call on
Call on
Call on
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | Call on |
| 13-02-2026 | Call on |
| 09-01-2026 | Call on |
| 12-12-2025 | Call on |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 400141/2019 Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kollam convicted three contract laborers (Raju, Appukuttan Pillai, and Arul Prakash) under sections 153 and 174(b) of the Railways Amendment Act, 2003, for unlawfully leaving a trolley laden with work materials on railway tracks between Ottakkal and Edamon stations on April 18, 2019, thereby endangering train passenger safety and obstructing rolling stock. The accused pleaded guilty and were sentenced to simple imprisonment till rising of court; the fourth accused (D. Soman) was deceased, so charges against him were abated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 400141/2019 Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kollam convicted three contract laborers (Raju, Appukuttan Pillai, and Arul Prakash) under sections 153 and 174(b) of the Railways Amendment Act, 2003, for unlawfully leaving a trolley laden with work materials on railway tracks between Ottakkal and Edamon stations on April 18, 2019, thereby endangering train passenger safety and obstructing rolling stock. The accused pleaded guilty and were sentenced to simple imprisonment till rising of court; the fourth accused (D. Soman) was deceased, so charges against him were abated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts