Shiny vs Sharafudeen — 100439/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section section26ORDER7RULE1. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED WITH COST on 01st April 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLKM060007032024
e-Filing Number
11-06-2024
Filing Number
100754/2024
Filing Date
11-06-2024
Registration No
100439/2024
Registration Date
11-06-2024
Court
Prl. Munsiff Court Kollam
Judge
1-Prl.Munsiff,Kollam
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DECREED WITH COST
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shiny
Adv. JIJU BABU S
Respondent(s)
Sharafudeen
Nisa
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Prl.Munsiff,Kollam
Disposed
Order/ Judgement
FOR HEARING
FOR HEARING
Further evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 25-03-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 13-03-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 28-02-2026 | Further evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: OS. No. 439/2024 (Shiny v. Sharafudeen & Nisa) The Munsiff's Court in Kollam decreed the suit in favor of plaintiff Shiny, who sought recovery of advance payment for a property sale agreement. Shiny paid Rs. 1,00,000 as advance on 20.11.2023 under an agreement to purchase 4.5 acres at Rs. 95,000 per cent, with a six-month performance period. When the defendants refused to complete the sale (having allegedly agreed to sell to another buyer at a higher price), the court found the defendants liable. The court awarded Shiny Rs. 1,04,500 with 9% interest from suit date to decree date and 6% thereafter, rejecting the claimed Rs. 25,000 compensation as unsupported by evidence, since the defendants offered no defense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: OS. No. 439/2024 (Shiny v. Sharafudeen & Nisa) The Munsiff's Court in Kollam decreed the suit in favor of plaintiff Shiny, who sought recovery of advance payment for a property sale agreement. Shiny paid Rs. 1,00,000 as advance on 20.11.2023 under an agreement to purchase 4.5 acres at Rs. 95,000 per cent, with a six-month performance period. When the defendants refused to complete the sale (having allegedly agreed to sell to another buyer at a higher price), the court found the defendants liable. The court awarded Shiny Rs. 1,04,500 with 9% interest from suit date to decree date and 6% thereafter, rejecting the claimed Rs. 25,000 compensation as unsupported by evidence, since the defendants offered no defense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts