Ms Shriram Finance Ltd vs Shanavas — 100522/2024
Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 30th March 2026.
EP - EXECUTION PETITION
CNR: KLKM030011512024
e-Filing Number
09-10-2024
Filing Number
102055/2024
Filing Date
18-Oct-2024
Registration No
100522/2024
Registration Date
23-Oct-2024
Court
WAKF Tribunal, Kollam
Judge
1-III Addl.SessionsJudge,Kollam
Decision Date
30-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Last updated 24-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ms Shriram Finance Ltd
Adv. PRESEEDA RAMACHANDRAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.Shanavas
-
2.Shahul Hameed
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The court dismissed Shriram Finance Ltd's execution petition for default on March 30, 2026, finding that the decree holder failed to take proper steps and did not cure procedural defects despite specific court directions. The dismissal was based on lack of diligent prosecution of the case by the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Mar-2026
Disposed
III Addl.SessionsJudge,Kollam
-
20-Mar-2026
Call on
III Addl.SessionsJudge,Kollam
-
17-Feb-2026
Await warrent
III Addl.SessionsJudge,Kollam
-
19-Jan-2026
Return of warrant
III Addl.SessionsJudge,Kollam
-
28-Nov-2025
Issue Arrest Warrant
III Addl.SessionsJudge,Kollam
-
09-Oct-2025
Return of notice
III Addl.SessionsJudge,Kollam
-
21-Aug-2025
Return of notice
III Addl.SessionsJudge,Kollam
-
16-Jul-2025
For Appearance Of Jd
III Addl.SessionsJudge,Kollam
-
28-May-2025
Return of notice
III Addl.SessionsJudge,Kollam
-
18-Feb-2025
Return of notice
III Addl.SessionsJudge,Kollam
-
05-Dec-2024
Issue notice
III Addl.SessionsJudge,Kollam
-
05-Nov-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Oct-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 100522/2024
The court dismissed Shriram Finance Ltd's execution petition for default on March 30, 2026, finding that the decree holder failed to take proper steps and did not cure procedural defects despite specific court directions. The dismissal was based on lack of diligent prosecution of the case by the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts