Sujith vs Nainapanicker Advocate - Saju George — 100033/2024

Case Summary: AS No. 33/2024 The appellate court partially allowed the defendants' appeal against a trial court injunction order in a right-of-way dispute. While confirming the injunction protecting the plaintiff's access to their property, the court reduced the protected pathway width from the claimed 7 feet to 5 feet based on the Advocate Commissioner's survey findings (1.27-1.60 metres). The court also allowed defendants to construct a boundary wall at the 5-foot mark. Notably, both parties bear their own costs due to the plaintiff's suppression of material facts about the demolished boundary wall. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.