KOTAK MAHINDRA PRIME LTD represented by its authorised officer prathyush Thomas vs Vinod — 343/2025

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 36. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 31st March 2026.

Case disposed

EP - EXECUTION PETITION

CNR: KLKM030006382025

Filing Number

7235/2025

Filing Date

26-Sep-2025

Registration No

343/2025

Registration Date

07-Oct-2025

Court

WAKF Tribunal, Kollam

Judge

1-III Addl.SessionsJudge,Kollam

Decision Date

31-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT

Last updated 24-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 36

Petitioner(s)

1.KOTAK MAHINDRA PRIME LTD represented by its authorised officer prathyush Thomas

Adv. MUHAMMED NAHAS

Respondent(s)

1.Vinod
2.Salinimol

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
31-Mar-2026

OrderView PDF

Case Summary: In Execution Petition No. 343/2025, the III Additional District Judge, Kollam dismissed Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd.'s execution petition against judgment debtors Vinod and Salinimol for default. The court found that despite the decree holder being represented, no steps had been taken to proceed with the execution, warranting dismissal without costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
31-Mar-2026

Disposed

III Addl.SessionsJudge,Kollam
20-Mar-2026

Call on

III Addl.SessionsJudge,Kollam
13-Feb-2026

Return of warrant

III Addl.SessionsJudge,Kollam
13-Jan-2026

Issue Arrest Warrant

III Addl.SessionsJudge,Kollam
01-Dec-2025

Return of notice

III Addl.SessionsJudge,Kollam
09-Oct-2025

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
26-Sep-2025

Case filed

Registration No. 343/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In Execution Petition No. 343/2025, the III Additional District Judge, Kollam dismissed Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd.'s execution petition against judgment debtors Vinod and Salinimol for default. The court found that despite the decree holder being represented, no steps had been taken to proceed with the execution, warranting dismissal without costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.