State of Kerala Police vs Roshith — 1432/2023

Case under Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Section U/s376,376(2). Status: Call on. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.

Call on Next hearing 22-Jun-2026 this date has passed

SC - SESSIONS CASE

CNR: KLKK520002562023

Filing Number

1432/2023

Filing Date

29-Apr-2025

Registration No

1432/2023

Registration Date

29-Apr-2025

Court

Fast Track Special Court, Nadapuram

Judge

1-Special Judge (Fast track POCSO)

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

1432

Police Station

Vatakara Police Station

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Section U/s376,376(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Kerala Police

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Roshith

Case History

  1. 22-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 02-Jun-2026

    Call on

    Special Judge (Fast track POCSO)

  3. 25-Apr-2026

    Call on

    Special Judge (Fast track POCSO)

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    for evidence

    Special Judge (Fast track POCSO)

  5. 04-Apr-2026

    Interim OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: SC 1432/2023 Outcome: The court dismissed the accused Roshith's petition seeking to recall witness PW2 (the survivor). The Special Judge found no valid grounds for recalling the witness, noting that no specific new circumstances had been presented since a similar recall application was dismissed in November 2025. The court also emphasized that repeated testimony would violate the POCSO Act's protective provisions for child victims, even though the witness is now an adult. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 04-Apr-2026

    Defence Evidence

    Special Judge (Fast track POCSO)

  7. 01-Apr-2026

    For hearing in Cmp

    Special Judge (Fast track POCSO)

  8. 28-Mar-2026

    For hearing in Cmp

    Special Judge (Fast track POCSO)

  9. 26-Mar-2026

    For hearing in Cmp

    Special Judge (Fast track POCSO)

  10. 25-Mar-2026

    For evidence

    Special Judge (Fast track POCSO)

  11. 16-Mar-2026

    Call on

    Special Judge (Fast track POCSO)

  12. 25-Feb-2026

    Defence Evidence

    Special Judge (Fast track POCSO)

  13. 13-Feb-2026

    Call on

    Special Judge (Fast track POCSO)

  14. 28-Jan-2026

    For evidence

    Special Judge (Fast track POCSO)

  15. 06-Jan-2026

    Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC

    Special Judge (Fast track POCSO)

  16. 17-Dec-2025

    Call on

    Special Judge (Fast track POCSO)

  17. 03-Dec-2025

    Defence Evidence

    Special Judge (Fast track POCSO)

  18. 19-Nov-2025

    For Hearing

    Special Judge (Fast track POCSO)

  19. 11-Nov-2025

    Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC

    Special Judge (Fast track POCSO)

  20. 05-Nov-2025

    Orders in IA

    Special Judge (Fast track POCSO)

  21. 29-Oct-2025

    Call with Mp

    Special Judge (Fast track POCSO)

  22. 15-Oct-2025

    Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC

    Special Judge (Fast track POCSO)

  23. 30-Sep-2025

    Declared Holidays

    Special Judge (Fast track POCSO)

  24. 23-Sep-2025

    Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC

    Special Judge (Fast track POCSO)

  25. 10-Sep-2025

    Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC

    Special Judge (Fast track POCSO)

  26. 20-Aug-2025

    Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC

    Special Judge (Fast track POCSO)

  27. 06-Aug-2025

    Call on

    Special Judge (Fast track POCSO)

  28. 29-Jul-2025

    Call on

    Special Judge (Fast track POCSO)

  29. 22-Jul-2025

    Call on

    Special Judge (Fast track POCSO)

  30. 01-Jul-2025

    Call on

    Special Judge (Fast track POCSO)

  31. 10-Jun-2025

    Adjourned

    Special Judge (Fast track POCSO)

  32. 20-May-2025

    Repeat Summons

    Special Judge (Fast track POCSO)

  33. 29-Apr-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  34. 29-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1432/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SC 1432/2023 Outcome: The court dismissed the accused Roshith's petition seeking to recall witness PW2 (the survivor). The Special Judge found no valid grounds for recalling the witness, noting that no specific new circumstances had been presented since a similar recall application was dismissed in November 2025. The court also emphasized that repeated testimony would violate the POCSO Act's protective provisions for child victims, even though the witness is now an adult. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case