Nalini M vs Jayaram P — 132/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section US 26 R 7. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 21st May 2026.

Issues Next hearing 21-May-2026 this date has passed

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLKK420001752022

Filing Number

174/2022

Filing Date

12-Jul-2022

Registration No

132/2022

Registration Date

12-Jul-2022

Court

Munsiff Court, Thamarassery,

Judge

1-Munsiff Magistrate

Last updated 27-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section US 26 R 7

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Nalini M

    Adv. Jyothiprasad K.V

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Jayaram P

Case History

  1. 21-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Issues

    Munsiff Magistrate

  3. 17-Jan-2026

    Issues

    Munsiff Magistrate

  4. 20-Dec-2025

    Appearance Of Parties

    Munsiff Magistrate

  5. 06-Nov-2025

    Adjourned

    Munsiff Magistrate

  6. 19-Sep-2025

    Appearance Of Parties

    Munsiff Magistrate

  7. 19-Jun-2025

    Written Statement

    Munsiff Magistrate

  8. 04-Apr-2025

    Restored

    Munsiff Magistrate

  9. 04-Apr-2025

    Call on

    Munsiff Magistrate

  10. 04-Apr-2025

    Appearance Of Parties

    Munsiff Magistrate

  11. 12-Jan-2023

    JudgementView PDF

    Summary: Original Suit No. 132/2022 for partition filed by Nalini M. against Jayaram P. was dismissed on January 12, 2023. The suit was dismissed under Order 9 Rule 5 of the Code of Civil Procedure because the defendant could not be served due to an incorrect address, and no further steps were taken despite summons being issued. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  12. 12-Jan-2023

    Disposed

    Munsiff Magistrate

  13. 27-Oct-2022

    For Steps

    Munsiff Magistrate

  14. 16-Aug-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  15. 12-Jul-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 132/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Original Suit No. 132/2022 for partition filed by Nalini M. against Jayaram P. was dismissed on January 12, 2023. The suit was dismissed under Order 9 Rule 5 of the Code of Civil Procedure because the defendant could not be served due to an incorrect address, and no further steps were taken despite summons being issued. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case