Manhu vs Neeraj Kurian — 44/2022
Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 12. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 02nd May 2026.
MC - MISCELLANEOUS CASE
CNR: KLKK400003372022
Filing Number
331/2022
Filing Date
16-08-2022
Registration No
44/2022
Registration Date
16-08-2022
Court
Grama Nyayalaya Koduvally
Judge
1-Nyayadhikari, Koduvally
Decision Date
02nd May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Manhu
Adv. Bijoy k Elias
Maijuel Ann Neeraj
Migwel (Minor)
Respondent(s)
Neeraj Kurian
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Nyayadhikari, Koduvally
Disposed
Order/ Judgement
FOR HEARING
Judge on leave / duty
FOR HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 28-04-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 25-04-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 25-03-2026 | Judge on leave / duty |
| 16-03-2026 | FOR HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: MC 44/2022 Court Decision: The Kaduvalli Gram Nyaya Court partially granted the petition filed under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The court found that the petitioner (Manhu) suffered physical, mental, sexual, and financial abuse from her husband (Neeraj Kurian) including dowry-related harassment, forced sexual acts, and threats to kidnap their children. The court issued protection orders prohibiting the respondent from harassing the petitioner and her family, ordered monthly maintenance of ₹5,000 each for the two minor children, awarded ₹50,000 as compensation for domestic violence, but rejected claims regarding return of jewelry and additional financial demands due to insufficient evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: MC 44/2022 Court Decision: The Kaduvalli Gram Nyaya Court partially granted the petition filed under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The court found that the petitioner (Manhu) suffered physical, mental, sexual, and financial abuse from her husband (Neeraj Kurian) including dowry-related harassment, forced sexual acts, and threats to kidnap their children. The court issued protection orders prohibiting the respondent from harassing the petitioner and her family, ordered monthly maintenance of ₹5,000 each for the two minor children, awarded ₹50,000 as compensation for domestic violence, but rejected claims regarding return of jewelry and additional financial demands due to insufficient evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts