Manhu vs Neeraj Kurian — 44/2022

Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 12. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 02nd May 2026.

Case disposed

MC - MISCELLANEOUS CASE

CNR: KLKK400003372022

Filing Number

331/2022

Filing Date

16-Aug-2022

Registration No

44/2022

Registration Date

16-Aug-2022

Court

Grama Nyayalaya Koduvally

Judge

1-Nyayadhikari, Koduvally

Decision Date

02-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Manhu

    Adv. Bijoy k Elias

  2. 2.Maijuel Ann Neeraj

  3. 3.Migwel (Minor)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Neeraj Kurian

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-May-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary: MC 44/2022 Court Decision: The Kaduvalli Gram Nyaya Court partially granted the petition filed under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The court found that the petitioner (Manhu) suffered physical, mental, sexual, and financial abuse from her husband (Neeraj Kurian) including dowry-related harassment, forced sexual acts, and threats to kidnap their children. The court issued protection orders prohibiting the respondent from harassing the petitioner and her family, ordered monthly maintenance of ₹5,000 each for the two minor children, awarded ₹50,000 as compensation for domestic violence, but rejected claims regarding return of jewelry and additional financial demands due to insufficient evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-May-2026

    Disposed

    Nyayadhikari, Koduvally

  4. 28-Apr-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    Nyayadhikari, Koduvally

  5. 25-Apr-2026

    For Hearing

    Nyayadhikari, Koduvally

  6. 25-Mar-2026

    Judge on leave / duty

    Nyayadhikari, Koduvally

  7. 16-Mar-2026

    For Hearing

    Nyayadhikari, Koduvally

  8. 11-Feb-2026

    Judge on leave / duty

    Nyayadhikari, Koduvally

  9. 28-Jan-2026

    For further hearing

    Nyayadhikari, Koduvally

  10. 21-Jan-2026

    For further hearing

    Nyayadhikari, Koduvally

  11. 31-Dec-2025

    No sitting notified

    Nyayadhikari, Koduvally

  12. 07-Nov-2025

    Judge on leave / duty

    Nyayadhikari, Koduvally

  13. 17-Oct-2025

    No sitting notified

    Nyayadhikari, Koduvally

  14. 24-Sep-2025

    For further hearing

    Nyayadhikari, Koduvally

  15. 12-Sep-2025

    For Hearing

    Nyayadhikari, Koduvally

  16. 02-Sep-2025

    For Hearing

    Nyayadhikari, Koduvally

  17. 11-Aug-2025

    For Hearing

    Nyayadhikari, Koduvally

  18. 05-Jul-2025

    For Hearing

    Nyayadhikari, Koduvally

  19. 28-Jun-2025

    Defendant/Respondent Evidence

    Nyayadhikari, Koduvally

  20. 10-Jun-2025

    For evidence

    Nyayadhikari, Koduvally

  21. 09-Jun-2025

    Call with Mp

    Nyayadhikari, Koduvally

  22. 04-Jun-2025

    Call with Mp

    Nyayadhikari, Koduvally

  23. 31-May-2025

    For Hearing

    Nyayadhikari, Koduvally

  24. 24-May-2025

    For evidence

    Nyayadhikari, Koduvally

  25. 06-May-2025

    Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence

    Nyayadhikari, Koduvally

  26. 02-May-2025

    Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence

    Nyayadhikari, Koduvally

  27. 05-Apr-2025

    Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence

    Nyayadhikari, Koduvally

  28. 01-Apr-2025

    Call with Mp

    Nyayadhikari, Koduvally

  29. 29-Mar-2025

    Call with Mp

    Nyayadhikari, Koduvally

  30. 22-Mar-2025

    Call with Mp

    Nyayadhikari, Koduvally

  31. 12-Mar-2025

    Call with Mp

    Nyayadhikari, Koduvally

  32. 21-Feb-2025

    Call with Mp

    Nyayadhikari, Koduvally

  33. 09-Jan-2025

    No sitting notified

    Nyayadhikari, Koduvally

  34. 06-Dec-2024

    Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence

    Nyayadhikari, Koduvally

  35. 06-Nov-2024

    Await report

    Nyayadhikari, Koduvally

  36. 04-Oct-2024

    Await report

    Nyayadhikari, Koduvally

  37. 30-Aug-2024

    For appearence of plaintiff/defendent

    Nyayadhikari, Koduvally

  38. 23-Aug-2024

    For Counter

    Nyayadhikari, Koduvally

  39. 24-Jul-2024

    No sitting notified

    Nyayadhikari, Koduvally

  40. 27-Jun-2024

    No sitting notified

    Nyayadhikari, Koduvally

  41. 23-May-2024

    No sitting notified

    Nyayadhikari, Koduvally

  42. 16-Apr-2024

    No sitting notified

    Nyayadhikari, Koduvally

  43. 07-Mar-2024

    No sitting notified

    Nyayadhikari, Koduvally

  44. 27-Jan-2024

    No sitting notified

    Nyayadhikari, Koduvally

  45. 21-Dec-2023

    No sitting notified

    Nyayadhikari, Koduvally

  46. 13-Nov-2023

    No sitting notified

    Nyayadhikari, Koduvally

  47. 09-Oct-2023

    No sitting notified

    Nyayadhikari, Koduvally

  48. 02-Sep-2023

    No sitting notified

    Nyayadhikari, Koduvally

  49. 26-Jul-2023

    No sitting notified

    Nyayadhikari, Koduvally

  50. 23-Jun-2023

    No sitting notified

    Nyayadhikari, Koduvally

  51. 25-May-2023

    No sitting notified

    Nyayadhikari, Koduvally

  52. 11-May-2023

    For Counter

    Nyayadhikari, Koduvally

  53. 03-May-2023

    For Counter

    Nyayadhikari, Koduvally

  54. 17-Apr-2023

    For Counter

    Nyayadhikari, Koduvally

  55. 18-Jan-2023

    Issue notice to respondent. For return of Notice.

    Nyayadhikari, Koduvally

  56. 05-Nov-2022

    Issue notice to respondent. For return of Notice.

    Nyayadhikari, Koduvally

  57. 27-Sep-2022

    Issue notice to respondent. For return of Notice.

    Nyayadhikari, Koduvally

  58. 16-Aug-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  59. 16-Aug-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 44/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MC 44/2022 Court Decision: The Kaduvalli Gram Nyaya Court partially granted the petition filed under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The court found that the petitioner (Manhu) suffered physical, mental, sexual, and financial abuse from her husband (Neeraj Kurian) including dowry-related harassment, forced sexual acts, and threats to kidnap their children. The court issued protection orders prohibiting the respondent from harassing the petitioner and her family, ordered monthly maintenance of ₹5,000 each for the two minor children, awarded ₹50,000 as compensation for domestic violence, but rejected claims regarding return of jewelry and additional financial demands due to insufficient evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case