SHO Perambra Police Station vs Sudhesh — 508/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 281. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

ST - SUMMARY TRIAL

CNR: KLKK350009372025

Filing Number

937/2025

Filing Date

17-May-2025

Registration No

508/2025

Registration Date

17-May-2025

Court

Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-I, Perambra

Judge

1-Judicial First Class Magistrate - I Perambra

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

399

Police Station

Perambra PS

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 281
Motor Vehicle Act \ Section 185

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHO (Station House Officer) Perambra Police Station

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sudhesh

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case 508/2025 Summary: Accused Sudhesh pleaded guilty and was convicted under Section 185 of the Motor Vehicle Act (sentenced to simple imprisonment till rising of court) and Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (fined Rs. 500, with 10 days' imprisonment as default penalty). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial First Class Magistrate - I Perambra

  5. 21-Feb-2026

    Fresh Summons

    Judicial First Class Magistrate - I Perambra

  6. 21-Nov-2025

    Adjourned

    Judicial First Class Magistrate - I Perambra

  7. 23-Oct-2025

    Adjourned

    Judicial First Class Magistrate - I Perambra

  8. 02-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 17-May-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 508/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case 508/2025 Summary: Accused Sudhesh pleaded guilty and was convicted under Section 185 of the Motor Vehicle Act (sentenced to simple imprisonment till rising of court) and Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (fined Rs. 500, with 10 days' imprisonment as default penalty). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case