Ismail vs Shamseela Advocate - Rajeevan Mallissery — 133/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section sec26&Order7Rule1. Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 16th March 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLKK340005522023
e-Filing Number
21-10-2023
Filing Number
551/2023
Filing Date
21-10-2023
Registration No
133/2023
Registration Date
21-10-2023
Court
Munsiff-Magistrate Court, Perambra
Judge
1-Munsiff Magistrate
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ismail
Adv. Jayachandran Nandanassery
Respondent(s)
Shamseela Advocate - Rajeevan Mallissery
Shamseer
Adv. Rajeevan Mallissery
Muhammad
Adv. Rajeevan Mallissery
Shaahil
Adv. Anandhakrishnan . O.P
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Munsiff Magistrate
Disposed
For Steps
Adjourned
Adjourned
Adjourned
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 18-02-2026 | For Steps |
| 01-12-2025 | Adjourned |
| 13-08-2025 | Adjourned |
| 25-06-2025 | Adjourned |
Final Orders / Judgements
In Original Suit No. 133/2023 before the Munsiff-Magistrate Court in Perambra, plaintiff Ismayil filed an injunction suit against four defendants (Shamseela, Shamseer, Muhammad, and Shahil). On March 16, 2026, the court dismissed the suit for default because the plaintiff's counsel appeared without instructions and could not proceed. No evidence was presented by either party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
In Original Suit No. 133/2023 before the Munsiff-Magistrate Court in Perambra, plaintiff Ismayil filed an injunction suit against four defendants (Shamseela, Shamseer, Muhammad, and Shahil). On March 16, 2026, the court dismissed the suit for default because the plaintiff's counsel appeared without instructions and could not proceed. No evidence was presented by either party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts