Jassy Olavakkunnel vs Appachan@Cheriyan Advocate - Preetha. R.B — 55/2023
Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section S26O7,R1. Status: Take steps. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLKK340002162023
Filing Number
215/2023
Filing Date
01-Apr-2023
Registration No
55/2023
Registration Date
01-Apr-2023
Court
Munsiff-Magistrate Court, Perambra
Judge
1-Munsiff Magistrate
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Jassy Olavakkunnel
Adv. Sebastian.K.M
Respondent(s)
-
1.Appachan@Cheriyan Advocate - Preetha. R.B
-
2.Rosakkutty
Adv. Preetha. R.B
-
3.Thomas
Adv. Preetha. R.B
-
4.Sebastian
Adv. Preetha. R.B
-
5.Benny
-
6.Chinju
-
7.Jithu
-
8.James
Case History
-
23-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
26-May-2026
Take steps
Munsiff Magistrate
-
16-Mar-2026
Call with IA
Munsiff Magistrate
-
19-Jan-2026
Call on
Munsiff Magistrate
-
19-Jan-2026
Disposed
Munsiff Magistrate
-
13-Aug-2024
JudgementView PDF
In Original Suit No. 55/2023 before the Munsiff-Magistrate Court, Perambra, Jassy Olavakkunnel filed a partition suit against eight defendants. On August 13, 2024, the suit was dismissed for default because the plaintiff failed to appear and was not represented in court, despite advocates filing vakalaath on her behalf. No evidence was recorded from either party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Aug-2024
—
Munsiff Magistrate
-
11-Jun-2024
Call with IA
Munsiff Magistrate
-
04-Mar-2024
Take steps
Munsiff Magistrate
-
10-Jan-2024
Written Statement
Munsiff Magistrate
-
16-Oct-2023
Written Statement
Munsiff Magistrate
-
24-Jul-2023
Written Statement
Munsiff Magistrate
-
30-May-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Apr-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 55/2023
In Original Suit No. 55/2023 before the Munsiff-Magistrate Court, Perambra, Jassy Olavakkunnel filed a partition suit against eight defendants. On August 13, 2024, the suit was dismissed for default because the plaintiff failed to appear and was not represented in court, despite advocates filing vakalaath on her behalf. No evidence was recorded from either party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts