KERALA GRAMIN BANK BO CHALIKKARA vs NAZLIN M K Advocate - Preetha. R.B — 9/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section SECTION26ORDER7RULE1. Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 16th March 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLKK340000092025
e-Filing Number
07-01-2025
Filing Number
9/2025
Filing Date
08-Jan-2025
Registration No
9/2025
Registration Date
08-Jan-2025
Court
Munsiff-Magistrate Court, Perambra
Judge
1-Munsiff Magistrate
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Dismissed
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KERALA GRAMIN BANK BO CHALIKKARA
Adv. ANOOP P
Respondent(s)
-
1.NAZLIN M K Advocate - Preetha. R.B
-
2.M K ABDULLA
Adv. Preetha. R.B
-
3.ZEENATH
Adv. Preetha. R.B
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
JudgementView PDF
The Court of Munsiff-Magistrate, Perambra dismissed Original Suit No. 9/2025 filed by Kerala Gramin Bank against Nazlin M.K, Abdulla M.K, and Zeenath as "not pressed" on March 16, 2026. The bank's counsel filed a memo indicating the suit would not be proceeded with, and the court accordingly dismissed it without recording any oral or documentary evidence from either party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
Munsiff Magistrate
-
23-Feb-2026
Judge on leave / duty
Munsiff Magistrate
-
02-Feb-2026
For settlement
Munsiff Magistrate
-
17-Nov-2025
Adjourned
Munsiff Magistrate
-
20-Sep-2025
Adjourned
Munsiff Magistrate
-
31-Jul-2025
Await report
Munsiff Magistrate
-
02-Jun-2025
Written Statement
Munsiff Magistrate
-
11-Feb-2025
Written Statement
Munsiff Magistrate
-
08-Jan-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Jan-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 9/2025
The Court of Munsiff-Magistrate, Perambra dismissed Original Suit No. 9/2025 filed by Kerala Gramin Bank against Nazlin M.K, Abdulla M.K, and Zeenath as "not pressed" on March 16, 2026. The bank's counsel filed a memo indicating the suit would not be proceeded with, and the court accordingly dismissed it without recording any oral or documentary evidence from either party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts