State of Kerala (Police)Nadapuram ps vs Ragil Advocate - Adv.Siju — 1303/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,324,325,34. Disposed: Uncontested--AQUITTED U/S 248(1) CR.PC on 23rd May 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLKK330016992021
Filing Number
1303/2021
Filing Date
26-10-2021
Registration No
1303/2021
Registration Date
26-10-2021
Court
Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Nadapuram
Judge
1-Judicial First Class Magistrate
Decision Date
23rd May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--AQUITTED U/S 248(1) CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
595
Police Station
Nadapuram PS
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala (Police)Nadapuram ps (Police Station)
Adv. N. Manojan, APP Grade II
Respondent(s)
Ragil Advocate - Adv.Siju
Sakhil Vasu
Vishnu
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial First Class Magistrate
Disposed
Order/ Judgement
Report on mediation
Referred to Mediator
BW to cws
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 22-05-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 10-04-2026 | Report on mediation |
| 16-03-2026 | Referred to Mediator |
| 23-01-2026 | BW to cws |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CC No. 1303/2021 Court Decision: The Nadapuram First Class Magistrate acquitted all three accused (Ragil P, Sakhil Vasu, and Vishnu) of charges under IPC sections 341, 323, 324, and 325 (wrongful restraint, hurt, and grievous hurt) on May 23, 2026. Key Reasoning: The prosecution's case collapsed due to lack of credible evidence. The primary witness (PW1) could not identify the assailants and admitted naming the accused based on hearsay; the alleged occurrence witness (PW2) denied witnessing the incident; and material witnesses retracted their earlier statements. The court found no evidence connecting the accused to the alleged offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CC No. 1303/2021 Court Decision: The Nadapuram First Class Magistrate acquitted all three accused (Ragil P, Sakhil Vasu, and Vishnu) of charges under IPC sections 341, 323, 324, and 325 (wrongful restraint, hurt, and grievous hurt) on May 23, 2026. Key Reasoning: The prosecution's case collapsed due to lack of credible evidence. The primary witness (PW1) could not identify the assailants and admitted naming the accused based on hearsay; the alleged occurrence witness (PW2) denied witnessing the incident; and material witnesses retracted their earlier statements. The court found no evidence connecting the accused to the alleged offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts