State of Kerala (Police)Nadapuram ps vs Ragil Advocate - Adv.Siju — 1303/2021

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,324,325,34. Disposed: Uncontested--AQUITTED U/S 248(1) CR.PC on 23rd May 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CALENDAR CASE

CNR: KLKK330016992021

Filing Number

1303/2021

Filing Date

26-Oct-2021

Registration No

1303/2021

Registration Date

26-Oct-2021

Court

Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Nadapuram

Judge

1-Judicial First Class Magistrate

Decision Date

23-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--AQUITTED U/S 248(1) CR.PC

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

595

Police Station

Nadapuram PS

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,324,325,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Kerala (Police)Nadapuram ps (Police Station)

    Adv. N. Manojan, APP Grade II

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ragil Advocate - Adv.Siju

  2. 2.Sakhil Vasu

  3. 3.Vishnu

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-May-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary: CC No. 1303/2021 Court Decision: The Nadapuram First Class Magistrate acquitted all three accused (Ragil P, Sakhil Vasu, and Vishnu) of charges under IPC sections 341, 323, 324, and 325 (wrongful restraint, hurt, and grievous hurt) on May 23, 2026. Key Reasoning: The prosecution's case collapsed due to lack of credible evidence. The primary witness (PW1) could not identify the assailants and admitted naming the accused based on hearsay; the alleged occurrence witness (PW2) denied witnessing the incident; and material witnesses retracted their earlier statements. The court found no evidence connecting the accused to the alleged offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-May-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  4. 22-May-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  5. 10-Apr-2026

    Report on mediation

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  6. 16-Mar-2026

    Referred to Mediator

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  7. 23-Jan-2026

    BW to cws

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  8. 20-Nov-2025

    BW to cws

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  9. 24-Oct-2025

    BW to cws

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  10. 11-Sep-2025

    BW to cws

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  11. 26-Jul-2025

    BW to cws

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  12. 23-May-2025

    Memo to SHO

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  13. 30-Apr-2025

    Issue Summons

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  14. 07-Feb-2025

    Repeat Summons

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  15. 20-Nov-2024

    Repeat Summons

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  16. 02-Sep-2024

    Issue Summons

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  17. 17-May-2024

    Issue Summons

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  18. 22-Mar-2024

    Issue Summons

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  19. 19-Jan-2024

    Issue Summons

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  20. 16-Oct-2023

    Issue Summons

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  21. 04-Sep-2023

    Issue Summons

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  22. 03-Jul-2023

    Issue Summons

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  23. 24-Apr-2023

    Issue Summons

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  24. 17-Jan-2023

    for evidence

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  25. 28-Sep-2022

    for evidence

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  26. 14-Jun-2022

    Call on

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  27. 13-Apr-2022

    For framing charge

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  28. 21-Dec-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  29. 26-Oct-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1303/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC No. 1303/2021 Court Decision: The Nadapuram First Class Magistrate acquitted all three accused (Ragil P, Sakhil Vasu, and Vishnu) of charges under IPC sections 341, 323, 324, and 325 (wrongful restraint, hurt, and grievous hurt) on May 23, 2026. Key Reasoning: The prosecution's case collapsed due to lack of credible evidence. The primary witness (PW1) could not identify the assailants and admitted naming the accused based on hearsay; the alleged occurrence witness (PW2) denied witnessing the incident; and material witnesses retracted their earlier statements. The court found no evidence connecting the accused to the alleged offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case