State of Kerala (Police) vs Muhammad Basheer Advocate - Biju Joseph Kuriachan — 460/2020
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,304(A). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED U/S 255 BNSS on 29th April 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLKK330010132020
Filing Number
1013/2020
Filing Date
18-05-2020
Registration No
460/2020
Registration Date
18-05-2020
Court
Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Nadapuram
Judge
1-Judicial First Class Magistrate
Decision Date
29th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED U/S 255 BNSS
FIR Details
FIR Number
605
Police Station
Nadapuram PS
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala (Police)
Adv. N. Manojan APP Grade II
Respondent(s)
Muhammad Basheer Advocate - Biju Joseph Kuriachan
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial First Class Magistrate
Disposed
For further hearing
Adjourned
For further hearing
For further hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-04-2026 | For further hearing |
| 22-04-2026 | Adjourned |
| 16-04-2026 | For further hearing |
| 30-03-2026 | For further hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CC 460/2020 Muhammad Basheer was acquitted of charges under IPC sections 279 (rash/negligent driving) and 304A (causing death by negligence) in a fatal road accident case. The court found fatal flaws in the prosecution's case: key eyewitnesses (PW2 and PW3) could not reliably identify the accused after 4-5 years without prior acquaintance, and critical contradictions existed regarding the vehicle model (Maruti Swift vs. Maruti Ritz in different documents), suggesting possible investigation fabrication and failing to establish the vehicle's identity beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CC 460/2020 Muhammad Basheer was acquitted of charges under IPC sections 279 (rash/negligent driving) and 304A (causing death by negligence) in a fatal road accident case. The court found fatal flaws in the prosecution's case: key eyewitnesses (PW2 and PW3) could not reliably identify the accused after 4-5 years without prior acquaintance, and critical contradictions existed regarding the vehicle model (Maruti Swift vs. Maruti Ritz in different documents), suggesting possible investigation fabrication and failing to establish the vehicle's identity beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts