State of Kerala (Police) vs Lijeesh @ Kuttappi — 666/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 354(A), 354(D), 506(1), 509,34. Disposed: Uncontested--AQUITTED U/S 248(1) CR.PC on 16th April 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLKK330008582021
Filing Number
666/2021
Filing Date
09-Apr-2021
Registration No
666/2021
Registration Date
09-Apr-2021
Court
Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Nadapuram
Judge
1-Judicial First Class Magistrate
Decision Date
16-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--AQUITTED U/S 248(1) CR.PC
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
8
Police Station
Valayam PS
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Kerala (Police)
Adv. N. Manojan, APP Grade II
Respondent(s)
-
1.Lijeesh @ Kuttappi
-
2.Sunil P.K
-
3.Ragil
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Apr-2026
JudgementView PDF
Case Summary: State of Kerala v. Lijeesh @ Kuttappi (666/2021) The court acquitted all three accused of charges under IPC sections 354A, 354D, 506(I), 509 read with 34, and Kerala Police Act 120(o). The prosecution failed to establish its case: the primary complainant retracted her allegations stating accused weren't involved; key witness PW2 was unavailable for cross-examination, rendering his evidence inadmissible; and no evidence proved the accused circulated the alleged audio clip through WhatsApp despite seizure of their mobile phones. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Apr-2026
Disposed
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
10-Apr-2026
Order/ Judgement
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
16-Mar-2026
Show casue to Investigating Officer
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
02-Mar-2026
Await warrent
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
16-Feb-2026
Repeat Summons
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
02-Feb-2026
Repeat Summons
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
05-Jan-2026
Repeat Summons
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
27-Nov-2025
Issue Summons
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
07-Nov-2025
for evidence
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
15-Oct-2025
Repeat Summons
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
26-Sep-2025
Issue Summons
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
22-Aug-2025
BW to cws
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
08-Aug-2025
BW to cws
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
23-Jun-2025
for evidence
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
04-Apr-2025
for evidence
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
21-Jan-2025
for evidence
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
18-Nov-2024
for evidence
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
12-Nov-2024
for evidence
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
29-Oct-2024
for evidence
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
10-Oct-2024
for evidence
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
20-Sep-2024
for evidence
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
03-Sep-2024
for evidence
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
09-Aug-2024
for evidence
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
10-May-2024
for evidence
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
23-Feb-2024
for evidence
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
27-Dec-2023
for evidence
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
26-Sep-2023
for evidence
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
26-Jul-2023
for evidence
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
22-May-2023
for evidence
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
24-Feb-2023
for evidence
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
23-Nov-2022
for evidence
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
02-Aug-2022
for evidence
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
29-Apr-2022
For framing charge
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
04-Jan-2022
Appearance of Accused
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
05-Nov-2021
Appearance of Accused
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
06-Aug-2021
Appearance of Accused
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
19-May-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Apr-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 666/2021
Case Summary: State of Kerala v. Lijeesh @ Kuttappi (666/2021) The court acquitted all three accused of charges under IPC sections 354A, 354D, 506(I), 509 read with 34, and Kerala Police Act 120(o). The prosecution failed to establish its case: the primary complainant retracted her allegations stating accused weren't involved; key witness PW2 was unavailable for cross-examination, rendering his evidence inadmissible; and no evidence proved the accused circulated the alleged audio clip through WhatsApp despite seizure of their mobile phones. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts