Nherolimeethal Noufiya vs Shaji Advocate - JISHINE BABU — 158/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section section 26 Order VII Rule 1. Status: For hearing on IA. Next hearing: 27th June 2026.

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLKK320006252025

For hearing on IA

Next Hearing

27th June 2026

Filing Number

393/2025

Filing Date

02-12-2025

Registration No

158/2025

Registration Date

03-12-2025

Court

Munsiff Court, Nadapuram

Judge

1-Munsiff Magistrate

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section section 26 Order VII Rule 1
Ia/1/2025 Classification : Urgent Application Section Nherolimeethal NoufiyaShaji
Ia/2/2025 Classification : Commission Application Section Nherolimeethal NoufiyaShaji
Ia/3/2025 Classification : Injunction Application Section Nherolimeethal NoufiyaShaji
Ia/4/2025 Classification : Petition Section Nherolimeethal NoufiyaShaji
Ia/1/2026 Classification : Petition Section ShajiNherolimeethal Noufiya
Ia/2/2026 Classification : Commission Application Section ShajiNherolimeethal Noufiya

Petitioner(s)

Nherolimeethal Noufiya

Adv. ALI.V

Respondent(s)

Shaji Advocate - JISHINE BABU

Bindu

Adv. JISHINE BABU

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Munsiff Magistrate

09-06-2026

For hearing on IA

25-05-2026

For hearing on IA

18-05-2026

Call with IA

24-03-2026

For Objection and hearing

16-03-2026

Issues

Interim Orders

28-01-2026
Order

Case Summary: OS 158/2025 (IA 3/2025) Nherolimeethal Noufiya sought a permanent injunction against neighbors Shaji and Bindu to prevent them from filling soil on an adjacent pathway (Schedule B property), which she claimed would block natural rainwater drainage onto her property (Schedule A). The court granted a status quo order rather than a full injunction, directing both parties to maintain the status quo as of the suit filing date. While the court found the petitioner's apprehension credible through an advocate commissioner's report documenting soil filling, it declined complete injunction relief because the petitioner failed to establish possession or authority over the disputed Schedule B property, and the respondents produced no documents proving their possession either. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: OS 158/2025 (IA 3/2025) Nherolimeethal Noufiya sought a permanent injunction against neighbors Shaji and Bindu to prevent them from filling soil on an adjacent pathway (Schedule B property), which she claimed would block natural rainwater drainage onto her property (Schedule A). The court granted a status quo order rather than a full injunction, directing both parties to maintain the status quo as of the suit filing date. While the court found the petitioner's apprehension credible through an advocate commissioner's report documenting soil filling, it declined complete injunction relief because the petitioner failed to establish possession or authority over the disputed Schedule B property, and the respondents produced no documents proving their possession either. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Munsiff Court, Nadapuram All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case