Ahammad Nasar vs Nisar V P — 96/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order 21 Rule 35 and section 50. Disposed: Contested--EP CLOSED on 16th March 2026.
EP - EXECUTION PETITION
CNR: KLKK320001402026
Filing Number
97/2026
Filing Date
27-Feb-2026
Registration No
96/2026
Registration Date
04-Mar-2026
Court
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Judge
1-Munsiff Magistrate
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--EP CLOSED
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ahammad Nasar
Adv. BIJU C R
-
2.Majeed
Adv. BIJU C R
-
3.Muhammadali
Adv. BIJU C R
-
4.Noushad
Adv. BIJU C R
Respondent(s)
-
1.Nisar V P
-
2.Cheriyadathil Muhammad Ali
-
3.Hajara
-
4.Shahida
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The court closed execution petition EP 96/2026 filed under Order XXI Rule 35 of the Civil Procedure Code, finding that the decree holder was represented, the property had been delivered, and full satisfaction of the decree was recorded. The petition was disposed of on March 16, 2026, with respondents not appearing before the Munsiff court in Nadapuram. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
Munsiff Magistrate
-
05-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 96/2026
The court closed execution petition EP 96/2026 filed under Order XXI Rule 35 of the Civil Procedure Code, finding that the decree holder was represented, the property had been delivered, and full satisfaction of the decree was recorded. The petition was disposed of on March 16, 2026, with respondents not appearing before the Munsiff court in Nadapuram. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts