Ashraf vs Mohammed Sawad V Advocate - SURESH BABU P — 9/2024
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--CONVICTED U/S 255(2) CR.PC on 25th April 2026.
ST - SUMMARY TRIAL
CNR: KLKK320000452024
Filing Number
12/2024
Filing Date
01-02-2024
Registration No
9/2024
Registration Date
01-02-2024
Court
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Judge
1-Munsiff Magistrate
Decision Date
25th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--CONVICTED U/S 255(2) CR.PC
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ashraf
Adv. ABDUL LATHEEF
Respondent(s)
Mohammed Sawad V Advocate - SURESH BABU P
Mohammed Sawad VBM
M/s BE A MAN
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Munsiff Magistrate
Disposed
Order/ Judgement
FOR HEARING
With connected case
Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 23-04-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 17-04-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 07-04-2026 | With connected case |
| 30-03-2026 | Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: S.T. No. 9/2024 - Ashraf v. Mohammed Sawad V The Court of Judicial Magistrate, Nadapuram convicted accused Mohammed Sawad V under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing cheques worth ₹5,00,000 each (totaling ₹20,00,000 across two cases) that were dishonored due to insufficient funds. The court found that all statutory formalities were complied with, the cheques were issued to discharge a legally enforceable debt, and proper notice was served despite the accused's denial. The accused was sentenced to simple imprisonment till rising of court and fined ₹20,00,000, with six months additional imprisonment in default of payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: S.T. No. 9/2024 - Ashraf v. Mohammed Sawad V The Court of Judicial Magistrate, Nadapuram convicted accused Mohammed Sawad V under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing cheques worth ₹5,00,000 each (totaling ₹20,00,000 across two cases) that were dishonored due to insufficient funds. The court found that all statutory formalities were complied with, the cheques were issued to discharge a legally enforceable debt, and proper notice was served despite the accused's denial. The accused was sentenced to simple imprisonment till rising of court and fined ₹20,00,000, with six months additional imprisonment in default of payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts