Ashraf vs Mohammed Sawad V Advocate - SURESH BABU P — 9/2024

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--CONVICTED U/S 255(2) CR.PC on 25th April 2026.

Case disposed

ST - SUMMARY TRIAL

CNR: KLKK320000452024

Filing Number

12/2024

Filing Date

01-Feb-2024

Registration No

9/2024

Registration Date

01-Feb-2024

Court

Munsiff Court, Nadapuram

Judge

1-Munsiff Magistrate

Decision Date

25-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--CONVICTED U/S 255(2) CR.PC

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ashraf

    Adv. ABDUL LATHEEF

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Mohammed Sawad V Advocate - SURESH BABU P

  2. 2.Mohammed Sawad VBM

  3. 3.M/s BE A MAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Apr-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary: S.T. No. 9/2024 - Ashraf v. Mohammed Sawad V The Court of Judicial Magistrate, Nadapuram convicted accused Mohammed Sawad V under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing cheques worth ₹5,00,000 each (totaling ₹20,00,000 across two cases) that were dishonored due to insufficient funds. The court found that all statutory formalities were complied with, the cheques were issued to discharge a legally enforceable debt, and proper notice was served despite the accused's denial. The accused was sentenced to simple imprisonment till rising of court and fined ₹20,00,000, with six months additional imprisonment in default of payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Munsiff Magistrate

  4. 23-Apr-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    Munsiff Magistrate

  5. 17-Apr-2026

    For Hearing

    Munsiff Magistrate

  6. 07-Apr-2026

    With connected case

    Munsiff Magistrate

  7. 30-Mar-2026

    Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC

    Munsiff Magistrate

  8. 26-Mar-2026

    With connected case

    Munsiff Magistrate

  9. 24-Mar-2026

    With connected case

    Munsiff Magistrate

  10. 17-Mar-2026

    With connected case

    Munsiff Magistrate

  11. 12-Mar-2026

    With connected case

    Munsiff Magistrate

  12. 10-Mar-2026

    Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence

    Munsiff Magistrate

  13. 25-Feb-2026

    With connected case

    Munsiff Magistrate

  14. 11-Feb-2026

    With connected case

    Munsiff Magistrate

  15. 31-Jan-2026

    With connected case

    Munsiff Magistrate

  16. 22-Jan-2026

    With connected case

    Munsiff Magistrate

  17. 19-Jan-2026

    For Hearing

    Munsiff Magistrate

  18. 16-Jan-2026

    For hearing in Cmp

    Munsiff Magistrate

  19. 15-Jan-2026

    For objecting and hearing Cmp

    Munsiff Magistrate

  20. 14-Jan-2026

    No sitting notified

    Munsiff Magistrate

  21. 30-Dec-2025

    For Hearing

    Munsiff Magistrate

  22. 17-Dec-2025

    For Hearing

    Munsiff Magistrate

  23. 15-Dec-2025

    For Hearing

    Munsiff Magistrate

  24. 09-Dec-2025

    With connected case

    Munsiff Magistrate

  25. 20-Nov-2025

    With connected case

    Munsiff Magistrate

  26. 14-Nov-2025

    With connected case

    Munsiff Magistrate

  27. 25-Oct-2025

    With connected case

    Munsiff Magistrate

  28. 06-Oct-2025

    With connected case

    Munsiff Magistrate

  29. 30-Sep-2025

    Declared Holidays

    Munsiff Magistrate

  30. 18-Sep-2025

    With connected case

    Munsiff Magistrate

  31. 10-Sep-2025

    With connected case

    Munsiff Magistrate

  32. 18-Aug-2025

    With connected case

    Munsiff Magistrate

  33. 14-Jul-2025

    With connected case

    Munsiff Magistrate

  34. 25-Jun-2025

    With connected case

    Munsiff Magistrate

  35. 21-May-2025

    With connected case

    Munsiff Magistrate

  36. 17-May-2025

    With connected case

    Munsiff Magistrate

  37. 22-Apr-2025

    With connected case

    Munsiff Magistrate

  38. 08-Apr-2025

    With connected case

    Munsiff Magistrate

  39. 24-Mar-2025

    With connected case

    Munsiff Magistrate

  40. 20-Feb-2025

    for evidence

    Munsiff Magistrate

  41. 10-Feb-2025

    For Objection and hearing

    Munsiff Magistrate

  42. 27-Jan-2025

    For Objection and hearing

    Munsiff Magistrate

  43. 04-Jan-2025

    For Objection and hearing

    Munsiff Magistrate

  44. 02-Dec-2024

    for evidence

    Munsiff Magistrate

  45. 28-Nov-2024

    Call on

    Munsiff Magistrate

  46. 08-Nov-2024

    Await warrent

    Munsiff Magistrate

  47. 01-Oct-2024

    Issue Arrest Warrant

    Munsiff Magistrate

  48. 24-Aug-2024

    For hearing in Cmp

    Munsiff Magistrate

  49. 05-Aug-2024

    For hearing in Cmp

    Munsiff Magistrate

  50. 01-Aug-2024

    For hearing in Cmp

    Munsiff Magistrate

  51. 29-Jul-2024

    For hearing in Cmp

    Munsiff Magistrate

  52. 11-Jul-2024

    For hearing in Cmp

    Munsiff Magistrate

  53. 18-Jun-2024

    For hearing in Cmp

    Munsiff Magistrate

  54. 29-May-2024

    For hearing in Cmp

    Munsiff Magistrate

  55. 22-May-2024

    For hearing in Cmp

    Munsiff Magistrate

  56. 29-Apr-2024

    For Counter

    Munsiff Magistrate

  57. 16-Apr-2024

    For Counter

    Munsiff Magistrate

  58. 16-Mar-2024

    for evidence

    Munsiff Magistrate

  59. 24-Feb-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  60. 01-Feb-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 9/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: S.T. No. 9/2024 - Ashraf v. Mohammed Sawad V The Court of Judicial Magistrate, Nadapuram convicted accused Mohammed Sawad V under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing cheques worth ₹5,00,000 each (totaling ₹20,00,000 across two cases) that were dishonored due to insufficient funds. The court found that all statutory formalities were complied with, the cheques were issued to discharge a legally enforceable debt, and proper notice was served despite the accused's denial. The accused was sentenced to simple imprisonment till rising of court and fined ₹20,00,000, with six months additional imprisonment in default of payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case