Ashraf vs Mohammad Sawad V Advocate - SURESH BABU P, SURESH BABU P — 7/2024
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act \ Section 138. Disposed: Contested--CONVICTED U/S 255(2) CR.PC on 25th April 2026.
ST - SUMMARY TRIAL
CNR: KLKK320000432024
Filing Number
10/2024
Filing Date
01-02-2024
Registration No
7/2024
Registration Date
01-02-2024
Court
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Judge
1-Munsiff Magistrate
Decision Date
25th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--CONVICTED U/S 255(2) CR.PC
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ashraf
Adv. LATHESH. V
Respondent(s)
Mohammad Sawad V Advocate - SURESH BABU P, SURESH BABU P
Mohammed Sawad VBM Unied
M/s BE A MAN
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Munsiff Magistrate
Disposed
Order/ Judgement
FOR HEARING
Defence Evidence
Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 23-04-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 17-04-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 07-04-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 30-03-2026 | Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: S.T. 7/2024 and S.T. 9/2024 Court Decision: The accused Mohammed Sawad V was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing four cheques totaling ₹20 lakhs that were dishonored due to insufficient funds. The court found all statutory formalities were properly complied with, the cheques were issued for a legally enforceable debt, and the accused failed to respond to legal notice. Sentence: Simple imprisonment till rising of court plus ₹20,00,000 fine in each case; default imprisonment of six months per case, with fines payable as compensation to complainant Ashraf. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: S.T. 7/2024 and S.T. 9/2024 Court Decision: The accused Mohammed Sawad V was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing four cheques totaling ₹20 lakhs that were dishonored due to insufficient funds. The court found all statutory formalities were properly complied with, the cheques were issued for a legally enforceable debt, and the accused failed to respond to legal notice. Sentence: Simple imprisonment till rising of court plus ₹20,00,000 fine in each case; default imprisonment of six months per case, with fines payable as compensation to complainant Ashraf. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts