M/s Triveni Associates Rep by managing partner, K. Anandan vs Soubish — 939/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--AQUITTED on 08th April 2026.

Crl.MP - CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETN.

CNR: KLKK310004692025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

25-02-2025

Filing Number

469/2025

Filing Date

28-02-2025

Registration No

939/2025

Registration Date

19-06-2025

Court

Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Vatakara

Judge

1-J.F.C.M,Vatakara

Decision Date

08th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--AQUITTED

Acts & Sections

NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT Section 138
Crl.MP/1/2026 Classification : Miscellaneous Application Section M/s Triveni Associates Rep by managing partner, K. AnandanSoubish
Crl.MP/2/2026 Classification : Withdrawal Petition Section M/s Triveni Associates Rep by managing partner, K. AnandanSoubish
Crl.MP/3/2026 Classification : Advance Application Section M/s Triveni Associates Rep by managing partner, K. AnandanSoubish

Petitioner(s)

M/s Triveni Associates Rep by managing partner, K. Anandan

Adv. JAYADEEP JAYACHANDRAN

Respondent(s)

Soubish

Hearing History

Judge: 1-J.F.C.M,Vatakara

08-04-2026

Disposed

16-03-2026

Await warrent

16-02-2026

Issue NBW

22-12-2025

Issue NBW

29-10-2025

Adjourned

Final Orders / Judgements

08-04-2026
Final Order

Case Summary: ST. 939/2025 M/s Triveni Associates filed a private complaint against Soubish under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (cheque dishonor). The complainant subsequently filed a petition seeking withdrawal, stating the matter was settled between parties. The court granted permission to withdraw the complaint, finding sufficient grounds, and acquitted the accused under Section 280 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: ST. 939/2025 M/s Triveni Associates filed a private complaint against Soubish under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (cheque dishonor). The complainant subsequently filed a petition seeking withdrawal, stating the matter was settled between parties. The court granted permission to withdraw the complaint, finding sufficient grounds, and acquitted the accused under Section 280 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Vatakara All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case