Veecos Rep Y Secratary Sreejisha.c.n vs Pookunhkoya Advocate - A.K. Vijayan — 84/2022
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--CONVICTED on 29th April 2026.
Crl.MP - CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETN.
CNR: KLKK310003382022
e-Filing Number
28-02-2022
Filing Number
297/2022
Filing Date
02-03-2022
Registration No
84/2022
Registration Date
02-03-2022
Court
Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Vatakara
Judge
1-J.F.C.M,Vatakara
Decision Date
29th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--CONVICTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Veecos Rep Y Secratary Sreejisha.c.n
Adv. Subhash E
Veecos Rep By Secretary
Adv. Subhash E
Veecos Rep By Secetary Sreejisha C N
Adv. Subhash E
Respondent(s)
Pookunhkoya Advocate - A.K. Vijayan
Hearing History
Judge: 1-J.F.C.M,Vatakara
Disposed
Order/Judgement
For further hearing
Call on
FOR HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 28-04-2026 | Order/Judgement |
| 27-04-2026 | For further hearing |
| 23-04-2026 | Call on |
| 20-04-2026 | FOR HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: ST No. 84/2022 Court Decision: The Judicial First Class Magistrate convicted Pookunhikoya under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, finding him guilty of issuing a cheque for Rs. 3,10,000 that was dishonoured due to insufficient funds. The court rejected the accused's defense that the entire loan amount had been paid, noting he produced no evidence to support this claim despite the burden being on him to prove it. Sentence: Simple imprisonment till rising of court and a fine of Rs. 4,41,500 (covering the cheque amount plus 9% interest from August 2021 to April 2026), with one month additional imprisonment in default of fine payment. The fine will be paid to the complainant as compensation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: ST No. 84/2022 Court Decision: The Judicial First Class Magistrate convicted Pookunhikoya under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, finding him guilty of issuing a cheque for Rs. 3,10,000 that was dishonoured due to insufficient funds. The court rejected the accused's defense that the entire loan amount had been paid, noting he produced no evidence to support this claim despite the burden being on him to prove it. Sentence: Simple imprisonment till rising of court and a fine of Rs. 4,41,500 (covering the cheque amount plus 9% interest from August 2021 to April 2026), with one month additional imprisonment in default of fine payment. The fine will be paid to the complainant as compensation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts