Kurutipravan Veettil Pocker Haji vs Malliveettil Ibrahim Haji — 300107/2022

Case under Lease and Rent Control Act 1965 Section 11(2)(b)and11(4)(i)ofrentcontrolAv. Status: With connected case. Next hearing: 28th March 2026.

RCP - RENT CONTROL PETITION

CNR: KLKK300004922022

With connected case

Next Hearing

28th March 2026

e-Filing Number

31-10-2022

Filing Number

479/2022

Filing Date

01-11-2022

Registration No

300107/2022

Registration Date

01-11-2022

Court

Munsiff Court, Vadakara

Judge

1-Munsiff

Acts & Sections

Lease and Rent Control Act 1965 Section 11(2)(b)and11(4)(i)ofrentcontrolAv
Ia/1/2026 Classification : Adjournment Application Section Kurutipravan Veettil Pocker HajiMalliveettil Ibrahim Haji

Petitioner(s)

Kurutipravan Veettil Pocker Haji

Adv. ANIL RAJ K K

Respondent(s)

Malliveettil Ibrahim Haji

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Munsiff

24-03-2026

With connected case

16-03-2026

Call on

07-03-2026

With connected case

05-03-2026

With connected case

23-02-2026

With connected case

Interim Orders

07-03-2024
Order
09-01-2025
Order

Summary: The Rent Controller Vatakara allowed both rent control petitions (RCP 41/2022 and RCP 107/2022) filed by the landlord against the tenant. An eviction order was passed under Sections 11(2)(b), 11(4)(i), and 11(3) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965, directing the respondent to vacate the leased shop room and hand it over to the petitioner within one month. The grounds for eviction included non-payment of rent arrears from January 2022, unauthorized subletting, and the landlord's bonafide need for the property for his daughter's bakery business. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Rent Controller Vatakara allowed both rent control petitions (RCP 41/2022 and RCP 107/2022) filed by the landlord against the tenant. An eviction order was passed under Sections 11(2)(b), 11(4)(i), and 11(3) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965, directing the respondent to vacate the leased shop room and hand it over to the petitioner within one month. The grounds for eviction included non-payment of rent arrears from January 2022, unauthorized subletting, and the landlord's bonafide need for the property for his daughter's bakery business. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Munsiff Court, Vadakara All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case