Hajara vs Thondan Ummer — 300094/2023
Case under --- Section U/S 11 (3). Status: For Steps. Next hearing: 31st March 2026.
RCP - RENT CONTROL PETITION
CNR: KLKK300004842023
Next Hearing
31st March 2026
e-Filing Number
12-10-2023
Filing Number
487/2023
Filing Date
16-10-2023
Registration No
300094/2023
Registration Date
16-10-2023
Court
Munsiff Court, Vadakara
Judge
1-Munsiff
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Hajara
Adv. ANIL RAJ K K
Shuibe
Adv. ANIL RAJ K K
Hajara
Adv. ANIL RAJ K K
Shuibe
Adv. ANIL RAJ K K
Respondent(s)
Thondan Ummer
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Munsiff
For Steps
Judge on leave / duty
For Steps
For Steps
Report on mediation
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | For Steps |
| 27-02-2026 | Judge on leave / duty |
| 07-02-2026 | For Steps |
| 03-01-2026 | For Steps |
| 02-12-2025 | Report on mediation |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary The Rent Controller/Munsiff, Vatakara allowed all four consolidated rent control petitions (RCP 90/23, 91/23, 92/23, 94/23) filed under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965. An eviction order was passed directing the respondents to vacate four commercial shop rooms (Door Nos. 18/14, 18/15, 18/16, 18/17) and hand them over to the petitioners (legal heirs of the deceased original owner) within one month. The court found the petitioners had genuine bonafide need to start a household utensil business, and in RCP 90/23, confirmed unauthorized subletting violated lease terms. Petitioners were awarded costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary The Rent Controller/Munsiff, Vatakara allowed all four consolidated rent control petitions (RCP 90/23, 91/23, 92/23, 94/23) filed under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965. An eviction order was passed directing the respondents to vacate four commercial shop rooms (Door Nos. 18/14, 18/15, 18/16, 18/17) and hand them over to the petitioners (legal heirs of the deceased original owner) within one month. The court found the petitioners had genuine bonafide need to start a household utensil business, and in RCP 90/23, confirmed unauthorized subletting violated lease terms. Petitioners were awarded costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts